Delaware 2023-2024 Regular Session

Delaware House Bill HB48

Introduced
1/12/23  
Introduced
1/12/23  
Engrossed
1/26/23  
Refer
1/12/23  
Engrossed
1/26/23  
Enrolled
5/11/23  
Refer
1/26/23  
Passed
5/25/23  
Enrolled
5/11/23  

Caption

An Act To Amend Title 18 Of The Delaware Code Relating To Record Retention Requirements.

Impact

The impact of HB 48 on state laws is significant as it modifies the existing statute regarding record retention. By mandating a longer retention period, it aligns with the growing emphasis on transparency and accountability in the insurance sector. The extended timeframe could lead to better management of insurance records, potentially resulting in better service for consumers and greater scrutiny of insurance practices. The requirements also signal a shift in regulatory expectations, pushing licensees to adopt more rigorous record-keeping practices.

Summary

House Bill 48, introduced in the Delaware General Assembly, is aimed at amending Title 18 of the Delaware Code to expand the record retention requirements for licensed insurance professionals, specifically producers, adjusters, and appraisers. The key stipulation of this bill is to extend the period of record retention from three years to five years. This change seeks to enhance compliance and accountability in the insurance industry by ensuring that vital records are kept for a longer duration, allowing for improved oversight and regulation by the Commissioner of Insurance.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding House Bill 48 appears to be predominantly supportive, reflecting an understanding of the necessity for enhanced regulatory measures within the insurance industry. Stakeholders, including insurance regulators and industry advocates, may view the extended retention period as a positive step towards upholding the integrity of insurance transactions. There are no significant mentions of contention or opposition in the discussions surrounding the bill, suggesting a consensus on the need for improved record-keeping standards.

Contention

As there are no major points of contention reported regarding HB 48, the discussion has focused primarily on the benefits of enhanced record retention within the insurance industry. No opposition or significant disagreements have been highlighted, indicating a clear path for the bill's progression through the legislative process. The changes, characterized as technical adjustments to conform to legislative drafting standards, ensure clarity and consistency in the law, minimizing potential legal ambiguities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT SJ00007

Resolution Granting The Claims Commissioner An Extension Of Time To Dispose Of Certain Claims Against The State Pursuant To Chapter 53 Of The General Statutes.

CT HJ00041

Resolution Granting The Claims Commissioner An Extension Of Time To Dispose Of Certain Claims.

CT HJ00023

Resolution Granting The Claims Commissioner Extensions Of Time To Dispose Of Certain Claims Against The State.

CT HJ00038

Resolution Concerning The Disposition Of Certain Claims Against The State Pursuant To Chapter 53 Of The General Statutes.

CA AB2009

California Travel and Tourism Commission.

CA AB1920

California Travel and Tourism Commission.

CA AB2323

Insurance: covered communications.

CT HJ00029

Resolution Granting The Claims Commissioner An Extension Of Time To Dispose Of Certain Claims Against The State Pursuant To Chapter 53 Of The General Statutes.