An Act To Amend Title 11 Of The Delaware Code Relating To Privacy For Correctional Officers, Probation Officers, And Parole Officers.
The enactment of SB164 will amend Title 11 of the Delaware Code by establishing legal grounds for correctional officers to protect their personal information from being publicly available. Upon making a valid written request, government agencies must remove such information from public records within 72 hours. The bill aims to create a safer environment for officers who face potential threats due to their profession, and it further allows officers to renew their privacy requests at intervals while still employed or grant extensions upon retirement under good standing.
Senate Bill 164 aims to enhance privacy protections for correctional officers, probation officers, and parole officers in Delaware. It allows these officers to submit written requests to keep their personal information confidential, preventing its public disclosure by government agencies or persons. This initiative arises from growing concerns over the safety of law enforcement and correctional personnel, acknowledging that public access to personal data can pose risks to their well-being and that of their families.
The sentiment surrounding SB164 appears generally positive among supporters, primarily stemming from law enforcement and correctional agencies who advocate for enhanced security measures for their personnel. The bill is welcomed as a necessary step toward ensuring the safety and privacy of correctional workers. However, some concerns may arise regarding the potential implications for transparency and public accessibility of information, as critics might argue that excessive privacy could obscure necessary oversight.
A notable point of contention in discussions about SB164 could revolve around balancing the need for privacy with public interest in transparency. While the bill seeks to protect the personal information of correctional officers, there might be debates on how much information about public servants should remain accessible. Some may argue that such measures could hinder accountability or the public's right to information about government employees, presenting a challenge that requires careful consideration as the bill progresses.