Delaware Senate Bill SB41

Delaware 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/26/23
• Engrossed: 3/15/23
• Refer: 1/26/23
• Refer: 3/16/23
• Enrolled: 4/25/23

Caption

An Act Concurring In Proposed Amendments To The Delaware Constitution Relating To Technical Corrections.

Impact

The bill effectively modernizes and clarifies provisions within the Delaware Constitution by removing outdated language and restructuring several sections for better coherence. Specifically, it proposes the removal of antiquated roles previously held by the State Treasurer and aligns the language of the Constitution with current governmental practices. Such legislative updates are essential to ensure that Delaware's governing documents remain relevant and functional, thereby helping citizens and officials understand their rights and responsibilities under the Constitution.

Summary

Senate Bill 41, aimed at concurring with proposed amendments to the Delaware Constitution related to technical corrections, represents a necessary legislative step for the enhancements and clarity of state constitutional law. This bill seeks to address inaccuracies within the Constitution, streamline language, and transfer certain provisions to more appropriate sections. The significance of this bill lies in its collaboration with the earlier House Bill 452, which initiates these amendments to enhance the state's legal framework, ensuring that it aligns with contemporary state government practices and modern language usage.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB41 appears to be positive, with strong support from members of the General Assembly who recognize the importance of maintaining an up-to-date and clear constitutional framework. The sponsors of the bill, including notable senators and representatives, advocate for the necessity of these corrections, emphasizing their role in enhancing legislative efficacy and consistency. There is an understanding that while technical in nature, these amendments are vital for the long-term health of the state's governance.

Contention

Despite the generally supportive sentiment, notable discussions may arise around the implications of altering the Constitution. Concerns could include whether the changes sufficiently address historical discrepancies or whether portions still requiring clarification are overlooked. Furthermore, bipartisan support is required for such amendments to progress, making it critical to ensure that all members of the General Assembly are onboard with these technical corrections to avoid any potential partisan contention.