Delaware House Bill HB145

Delaware 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/5/25
• Refer: 6/5/25

Caption

An Act To Amend Title 11 Of The Delaware Code Relating To Reverse Location And Reverse Keyword Searches And Court Orders.

Impact

The proposed legislation would significantly alter the legal landscape concerning privacy rights in Delaware. By preventing the government from obtaining data through reverse-location and reverse-keyword requests, the bill reinforces protections against invasive surveillance practices. Additionally, it establishes a private right of action for individuals whose information is improperly obtained, allowing them to seek redress in court. This is significant as it further empowers citizens to protect their rights and personal data from government overreach.

Summary

House Bill 145 aims to amend Title 11 of the Delaware Code concerning reverse location and reverse keyword searches and court orders. The bill addresses the growing concerns over mass surveillance conducted by government entities through broad searches that do not specify the individuals under investigation. By prohibiting reverse-location court orders and reverse-keyword court orders, the bill seeks to safeguard citizens' privacy and personal liberties, ensuring that law enforcement officials cannot conduct expansive data collection without probable cause.

Sentiment

The reception of HB 145 has been largely positive among civil liberties advocates and privacy rights organizations. Supporters argue that the bill is a critical step toward protecting individual freedoms and curbing unfettered government surveillance. However, there is also concern among law enforcement officials who argue that such limitations could hinder their ability to investigate crimes effectively, highlighting a tension between public safety and personal freedom.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 145 revolve around the balance of privacy rights and law enforcement capabilities. While many advocates for civil liberties emphasize the importance of protecting against unjustified surveillance, critics express that the bill may complicate legitimate law enforcement operations. Furthermore, the bill's strict prohibition of reverse-location and reverse-keyword requests raises questions about the adequacy of existing measures to ensure public safety without infringing on individual rights.