Delaware House Bill HB31

Delaware 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/19/24
• Refer: 12/19/24

Caption

An Act To Amend Title 6 Of The Delaware Code Relating To Veterans' Benefits And Trade Practices.

Impact

Should HB31 be enacted, it will significantly affect how veterans receive assistance navigating the complex claims process for V.A. benefits. By prohibiting non-accredited individuals from charging for their services, the bill is expected to reduce the prevalence of unethical practices that prey on veterans. Furthermore, it establishes a legal framework that allows veterans to take action against violators, potentially leading to increased accountability within the industry that provides support services for veterans.

Summary

House Bill 31 seeks to amend Title 6 of the Delaware Code to strengthen regulations surrounding the provision of assistance to veterans in accessing their benefits. The bill specifically targets non-Veterans Administration (V.A.) accredited individuals and businesses that charge veterans for services related to their benefits. It aims to prevent predatory practices that mislead veterans into paying for services that are often available at no cost through accredited agencies. By establishing stricter guidelines and requirements for non-accredited service providers, the bill intends to protect veterans from potential exploitation and ensure they receive accurate information regarding their benefits.

Sentiment

The sentiment towards HB31 appears to be largely positive among advocates for veterans' rights and organizations dedicated to supporting military personnel. Supporters of the bill argue that it addresses a critical gap in veteran services by eliminating unregulated and potentially harmful practices. However, there may be some concern from service providers who fear the bill may limit their ability to offer paid assistance for legitimate services not covered by the V.A.

Contention

Despite the bill's positive intentions, discussions may arise surrounding the balance of regulation versus service availability. Opponents might argue that overly stringent regulations could dissuade capable providers from offering necessary support to veterans, particularly in areas where V.A. services may be lacking. Additionally, the implementation timeline established in the bill, set to take effect 18 months after enactment, may be scrutinized, as stakeholders debate whether this provides enough time for adequate compliance and adjustment within the industry.