Michigan Senate Bill SB0215

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/17/25
• Refer: 4/17/25
• Report Pass: 5/14/25
• Refer: 5/14/25
• Report Pass: 5/21/25
• Engrossed: 6/3/25
• Refer: 6/3/25

Caption

Veterans: benefits; Michigan consumer protection act; amend to enhance protections for individuals applying for veterans benefits. Amends sec. 3k of 1976 PA 331 (MCL 445.903k).

Impact

If enacted, SB 215 will significantly impact the legal framework governing veterans' services in Michigan by increasing scrutiny over those who offer such benefits. This legislation aims to create a safer environment for veterans and their families, eliminating the risk of misleading information and exploitation by unaccredited entities. Thus, it reinforces the integrity of the services that veterans rely on, potentially leading to increased trust in the avenues available for accessing benefits.

Summary

Senate Bill 215 aims to amend the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, specifically focusing on enhancing the protections for individuals applying for veterans' benefits. The bill encompasses several critical stipulations, including defining who is qualified to provide veterans' benefit services, establishing regulations around receiving compensation for these services, and ensuring the protection of veterans' personal information. Notably, it establishes that only accredited individuals or employees of recognized veterans' organizations are permitted to assist veterans in obtaining benefits, thereby attempting to reduce fraudulent practices in the trade of veterans' benefits services.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 215 seems largely positive among supporters who believe it is a necessary measure to protect veterans from fraud and ensure that they receive legitimate assistance in securing their benefits. However, there may be concerns from some groups about the implications for service access, particularly if the bill is perceived to unnecessarily restrict the availability of assistance by limiting the pool of individuals qualified to help veterans navigate the benefits system.

Contention

There are points of contention related to the balance of accessibility versus regulation. Advocates argue that the bill is crucial for protecting veterans; however, critics might express concerns that it could hinder access to essential services by restricting help only to those who are accredited. Furthermore, ensuring that there are no international call centers handles personal data reinforces privacy but could raise fears of potential operational limitations in providing adequate support for veterans across Michigan.