SPONSOR: Rep. Dukes & Sen. Poore Reps. Gorman, Hilovsky, K. Johnson, Phillips, Romer, Ross Levin, Snyder-Hall; Sens. Hansen, Hocker, Hoffner, Paradee, Pettyjohn, Wilson HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 153rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE BILL NO. 75 AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 10 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR CIVIL CLAIMS BASED ON SEXUAL ABUSE OF A MINOR.
SPONSOR: Rep. Dukes & Sen. Poore Reps. Gorman, Hilovsky, K. Johnson, Phillips, Romer, Ross Levin, Snyder-Hall; Sens. Hansen, Hocker, Hoffner, Paradee, Pettyjohn, Wilson
SPONSOR: Rep. Dukes & Sen. Poore
Reps. Gorman, Hilovsky, K. Johnson, Phillips, Romer, Ross Levin, Snyder-Hall; Sens. Hansen, Hocker, Hoffner, Paradee, Pettyjohn, Wilson
SPONSOR:
Rep. Dukes & Sen. Poore
Reps. Gorman, Hilovsky, K. Johnson, Phillips, Romer, Ross Levin, Snyder-Hall; Sens. Hansen, Hocker, Hoffner, Paradee, Pettyjohn, Wilson
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
153rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY
HOUSE BILL NO. 75
AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 10 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR CIVIL CLAIMS BASED ON SEXUAL ABUSE OF A MINOR.
WHEREAS, in June of 2007, the 144 th General Assembly unanimously passed Senate Bill 29, which gave victims of childhood sexual abuse a two year window, allowing them to bring a civil action against their abusers in cases previously barred by the law. The bill, known as the Child Victims Act of 2007, was signed into law on July 10, 2007; and WHEREAS, in enacting the bipartisan Child Victims Act, Delaware was one of two states at the forefront of a revolution for children; and WHEREAS, following the enactment of SB 29, opponents of the bill challenged it in the Delaware Supreme Court in Sheehan v. Oblates of St. Francis de Sales, 15 A.3d 1247 (Del. 2011) (en banc), claiming that retroactivity and changes to the statute of limitation were unconstitutional; and WHEREAS, the Delaware Supreme Court unanimously upheld the constitutionality of the Child Victims Act of 2007; and WHEREAS, 22 states have now followed the pioneering examples of Delaware and California in enacting Child Victims Act legislation for survivors of childhood sexual abuse, most recently in the State of Maryland where SB 686 (The Child Victims Act of 2023) was signed by its Governor on April 11, 2023, to retroactively remove the statute of limitations for all claims of sexual abuse of a minor in that State; and WHEREAS, while all victims of childhood sexual abuse were covered by the Child Victims Act of 2007, many were too young to avail themselves of the opportunity to sue their abusers during the two year window provided by the Act; and WHEREAS, for example, an 8-year-old child sexually abused in 1999 was only 16 when Delaware had its two year window for legal claims; and WHEREAS, victims of child sexual abuse face significant barriers to disclosure such that the average length of time before disclosure is around 20 years and significantly longer for those who experience institutional abuse; and WHEREAS, most victims do not acknowledge or understand their abuse and its consequences until well into adulthood, long after the statute of limitations has expired on their claims; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of this legislature and the purpose of this legislation to give full access to justice for victims of childhood sexual abuse regardless of when it occurred. NOW, THEREFORE: BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE: Section 1. Amend 8145, Title 10 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows: 8145. Civil suits for damages based upon sexual abuse of a minor by an adult. (a) A cause of action based upon the sexual abuse of a minor by an adult may be filed in the Superior Court of this State at any time following the commission of the act or acts that constituted the sexual abuse. A civil cause of action for sexual abuse of a minor shall be based upon sexual acts that would constitute a criminal offense under the Delaware Code. (b) For a period of 2 years following July 9, 2007, victims of child sexual abuse that occurred in this State who have been barred from filing suit against their abusers by virtue of the expiration of the former civil statute of limitations, shall be permitted to file those claims in the Superior Court of this State. If the person committing the act of sexual abuse against a minor was employed by an institution, agency, firm, business, corporation, or other public or private legal entity that owned a duty of care to the victim, or the accused and the minor were engaged in some activity over which the legal entity had some degree of responsibility or control, damages against the legal entity shall be awarded under this subsection only if there is a finding of gross negligence on the part of the legal entity. Victims of child sexual abuse who have been barred from filing a cause of action based upon the sexual abuse of a minor by an adult by virtue of the expiration of a civil statute of limitation, notice of claim, presentation deadline, or any other time limit that had expired, or for which a final judgment was rendered based on the expiration of any time limitation or other procedural bases, are permitted to file those claims in the Superior Court at any time. (c) No action relating to the sexual abuse of a minor by an adult that is filed or pending after [the effective date of this act] may be dismissed by virtue of the expiration of a civil statute of limitations. (d) This section applies to any actions for damages against any person, institution, public or private entity, including any charitable organization, educational institution, hospital, and the government. The State waives sovereign immunity in a cause of action based upon the sexual abuse of a minor by an adult. (c) (e) A person against whom a suit is filed may recover attorneys fees where the Court determines that a false accusation was made with no basis in fact and with malicious intent. A verdict in favor of the accused shall not be the sole basis for a determination that an accusation was false. The Court must make an independent finding of an improper motive to award attorneys fees under this section.
WHEREAS, in June of 2007, the 144 th General Assembly unanimously passed Senate Bill 29, which gave victims of childhood sexual abuse a two year window, allowing them to bring a civil action against their abusers in cases previously barred by the law. The bill, known as the Child Victims Act of 2007, was signed into law on July 10, 2007; and
WHEREAS, in enacting the bipartisan Child Victims Act, Delaware was one of two states at the forefront of a revolution for children; and
WHEREAS, following the enactment of SB 29, opponents of the bill challenged it in the Delaware Supreme Court in Sheehan v. Oblates of St. Francis de Sales, 15 A.3d 1247 (Del. 2011) (en banc), claiming that retroactivity and changes to the statute of limitation were unconstitutional; and
WHEREAS, the Delaware Supreme Court unanimously upheld the constitutionality of the Child Victims Act of 2007; and
WHEREAS, 22 states have now followed the pioneering examples of Delaware and California in enacting Child Victims Act legislation for survivors of childhood sexual abuse, most recently in the State of Maryland where SB 686 (The Child Victims Act of 2023) was signed by its Governor on April 11, 2023, to retroactively remove the statute of limitations for all claims of sexual abuse of a minor in that State; and
WHEREAS, while all victims of childhood sexual abuse were covered by the Child Victims Act of 2007, many were too young to avail themselves of the opportunity to sue their abusers during the two year window provided by the Act; and
WHEREAS, for example, an 8-year-old child sexually abused in 1999 was only 16 when Delaware had its two year window for legal claims; and
WHEREAS, victims of child sexual abuse face significant barriers to disclosure such that the average length of time before disclosure is around 20 years and significantly longer for those who experience institutional abuse; and
WHEREAS, most victims do not acknowledge or understand their abuse and its consequences until well into adulthood, long after the statute of limitations has expired on their claims; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of this legislature and the purpose of this legislation to give full access to justice for victims of childhood sexual abuse regardless of when it occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE:
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE:
Section 1. Amend 8145, Title 10 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:
8145. Civil suits for damages based upon sexual abuse of a minor by an adult.
(a) A cause of action based upon the sexual abuse of a minor by an adult may be filed in the Superior Court of this State at any time following the commission of the act or acts that constituted the sexual abuse. A civil cause of action for sexual abuse of a minor shall be based upon sexual acts that would constitute a criminal offense under the Delaware Code.
(b) For a period of 2 years following July 9, 2007, victims of child sexual abuse that occurred in this State who have been barred from filing suit against their abusers by virtue of the expiration of the former civil statute of limitations, shall be permitted to file those claims in the Superior Court of this State. If the person committing the act of sexual abuse against a minor was employed by an institution, agency, firm, business, corporation, or other public or private legal entity that owned a duty of care to the victim, or the accused and the minor were engaged in some activity over which the legal entity had some degree of responsibility or control, damages against the legal entity shall be awarded under this subsection only if there is a finding of gross negligence on the part of the legal entity. Victims of child sexual abuse who have been barred from filing a cause of action based upon the sexual abuse of a minor by an adult by virtue of the expiration of a civil statute of limitation, notice of claim, presentation deadline, or any other time limit that had expired, or for which a final judgment was rendered based on the expiration of any time limitation or other procedural bases, are permitted to file those claims in the Superior Court at any time.
(c) No action relating to the sexual abuse of a minor by an adult that is filed or pending after [the effective date of this act] may be dismissed by virtue of the expiration of a civil statute of limitations.
(d) This section applies to any actions for damages against any person, institution, public or private entity, including any charitable organization, educational institution, hospital, and the government. The State waives sovereign immunity in a cause of action based upon the sexual abuse of a minor by an adult.
(c) (e) A person against whom a suit is filed may recover attorneys fees where the Court determines that a false accusation was made with no basis in fact and with malicious intent. A verdict in favor of the accused shall not be the sole basis for a determination that an accusation was false. The Court must make an independent finding of an improper motive to award attorneys fees under this section.
SYNOPSIS A victim of child sexual abuse that occurred in this State who has been barred from filing suit against the victims abuser by virtue of the expiration of a former civil statute of limitations are permitted to file these claims in the Superior Court of this state at any time. This is intended to apply retroactively.
SYNOPSIS
A victim of child sexual abuse that occurred in this State who has been barred from filing suit against the victims abuser by virtue of the expiration of a former civil statute of limitations are permitted to file these claims in the Superior Court of this state at any time. This is intended to apply retroactively.