An Act To Amend Title 3, Title 6, Title 9, Title 10, Title 11, Title 14, Title 16, Title 19, Title 21, Title 24, Title 26, Title 29, Title 30, And Title 31 Of The Delaware Code, And The Charter Of The Town Of Newport, Relating To Technical Corrections.
The implementation of SB169 will lead to a more orderly and intelligible body of law in Delaware. By correcting errors and inconsistencies that arose in previous legislative sessions, the bill helps streamline legal processes and enhance legal clarity for both citizens and law enforcement. This is particularly relevant for attorneys and those involved in the legislative process, as they rely on accurate legal texts to navigate the law. The amendments will solidify the standards of the Delaware Legislative Drafting Manual, promoting consistency throughout the legal documents.
Senate Bill 169 seeks to amend multiple titles of the Delaware Code and the Charter of the Town of Newport, primarily focusing on making technical corrections. These changes have been identified by the Code Revisors after reviewing the existing legislation and aim to ensure clarity and compliance with the current legal standards. The bill amends defined terms and corrects various phrasing and grouping errors, reflecting necessary adjustments to maintain the integrity of the legal framework within Delaware.
Overall, the sentiment around SB169 appears to be positive, as the bill addresses the technical needs of the legal framework without introducing controversial elements. Legislators from various parties recognize the necessity of maintaining updated codes that accurately reflect current laws and practices, and there seems to be a consensus on the importance of precision in legal language. However, there is always a degree of scrutiny regarding the appropriateness of the amendments made, as any legislative change can attract debate about its implications.
While the bill primarily deals with technical adjustments that seem straightforward, the requirement for a greater than majority vote for its passage raises minor concerns among legislative members. This need for increased consensus may indicate that some of the sections amended might touch on contentious issues inadvertently. Nevertheless, stakeholders generally view these corrections as essential for refining the functionality of the legislation rather than sparking significant debate.