Florida 2022 2022 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H0519 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 01/26/2022

                    This docum ent does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives. 
STORAGE NAME: h0519e.JDC 
DATE: 1/26/2022 
 
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS  
 
BILL #: CS/HB 519    Rights of Third Parties Under the Uniform Commercial Code 
SPONSOR(S): Civil Justice & Property Rights Subcommittee, Leek 
TIED BILLS:   IDEN./SIM. BILLS: CS/SB 336 
 
REFERENCE 	ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or 
BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF 
1) Civil Justice & Property Rights Subcommittee 16 Y, 0 N, As CS Mawn Jones 
2) Regulatory Reform Subcommittee 	17 Y, 0 N Wright Anstead 
3) Judiciary Committee 	20 Y, 0 N Mawn Kramer 
SUMMARY ANALYSIS 
The Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) is a set of laws, adopted by all fifty states, governing and providing 
uniformity in commercial transactions in the United States. Florida’s UCC provisions are codified in chs. 670–
680, Florida Statutes. 
 
Article 9 of the UCC (codified in ch. 679, F.S.) governs secured transactions, meaning transactions involving 
the granting of credit secured by personal property (“collateral”), where the creditor may take possession of the 
collateral if the debtor defaults on the loan. In 2001, to promote the free assignability of personal property, 
including intangible property rights, the UCC was amended to include a general restriction on contract 
provisions which prohibit or restrict the creation of a security interest in certain types of collateral (“Article 9 
override”), including: 
 General intangibles, meaning any personal property, including things in action other than certain 
defined collateral types (codified in s. 9-408 of the UCC and s. 679.4081, F.S.); and  
 Payment intangibles, meaning general intangibles under which the account debtor’s principal obligation 
is a monetary obligation (codified in s. 9-406 of the UCC and s. 679.4061, F.S.). 
 
The Article 9 override may apply where an owner in a partnership or a limited liability company (“LLC”) creates 
a security interest in his or her ownership interest in the business, even where the business’s operating 
agreement prohibits the owner from doing so, because such interest is generally classified as either a general 
intangible or a payment intangible. However, applying the Article 9 override in such instances potentially 
conflicts with the “pick your partner principle,” which recognizes that an owner in such a business has a 
substantial stake in determining co-owners and should not generally be forced into doing business with 
someone with whom the owner did not intend to do business.  
 
In 2018, ss. 9-406 and 9-408 of the UCC were amended to eliminate the potential conflict with the “pick your 
partner principle.” Specifically, the amendments provided that the Article 9 override does not apply to a security 
interest in an ownership interest in a general or limited partnership or an LLC. To date, at least 10 states have 
adopted some form of these amendments.  
 
CS/HB 519 amends ss. 679.4061 and 679.4081, F.S., to incorporate the 2018 UCC amendments. Specifically, 
the bill provides that the override provisions set out in those sections do not apply to a security interest in an 
ownership interest in a general partnership, a limited partnership, or an LLC. This removes any potential 
conflict between these sections and the “pick your partner principle” and promotes the freedom of the owners 
in a partnership or LLC to contract. 
 
The bill does not appear to have a fiscal impact on state or local governments.  
 
The bill provides an effective date of January 1, 2023.  
    STORAGE NAME: h0519e.JDC 	PAGE: 2 
DATE: 1/26/2022 
  
FULL ANALYSIS 
I.  SUBSTANTIVE ANALYSIS 
 
A. EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGES: 
Background 
 
The Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”), a set of laws governing and providing uniformity in commercial 
transactions in the United States, is a joint project between the Uniform Law Commission (“ULC”) and 
the American Law Institute (“ALI”).
1
 The UCC has been adopted by all fifty states.
2
 The UCC includes 
both general provisions and specific provisions governing sales, leases, negotiable instruments, bank 
deposits and collections, letters of credit, documents of title, investment securities, secured 
transactions, and leases.
3
 Florida’s UCC provisions are codified in chs. 670–680, Florida Statutes. 
 
Article 9’s Anti-Assignment Override 
 
Article 9 of the UCC (codified in ch. 679, F.S.) governs secured transactions, which are transactions 
involving the granting of credit secured by personal property (“collateral”), where the creditor may take 
possession of the collateral if the debtor defaults on the loan.
4
 In 2001, to promote the free assignability 
of personal property, including intangible property rights, and the ability of a debtor to obtain credit, the 
UCC was amended to include a general restriction against contract provisions prohibiting the creation 
of a security interest in certain types of collateral (“Article 9 override”),
5
 including: 
 General intangibles, meaning any personal property, including things in action other than certain 
defined collateral types (codified in s. 9-408 of the UCC and s. 679.4081, F.S.);
6
 and  
 Payment intangibles, meaning general intangibles under which the account debtor’s
7
 principal 
obligation is a monetary obligation (codified in s. 9-406 of the UCC and s. 679.4061, F.S.).
8
  
 
In other words, the Article 9 override renders ineffective restrictions between an account debtor and a 
debtor preventing the assignment of general intangibles or payment intangibles as collateral for a debt. 
The Article 9 override also applies to an ordinary security interest in a complete ownership interest or in 
economic rights alone and to the outright sale of a payment intangible.
9
  
 
In the context of an ownership interest in a business, the “account debtor” is the business while the 
“debtor” is the person holding the ownership interest. Thus, the Article 9 override would not apply to an 
anti-assignment clause in a contract between a business’s owners themselves; it would only apply to 
such a clause in a contract between a business’s owners and the business.  
 
Potential Conflict with the “Pick Your Partner Principle” 
 
                                                
1
 Chs. 670-680, F.S.; Uniform Law Commission, Uniform Commercial Code, https://www.uniformlaws.org/acts/ucc (last visited Jan. 26, 
2022). 
2
 Id. 
3
 Id. 
4
 Id. 
5
 Sara T. Toner and R. Parker Havis, Lessons From Delaware: Navigating the 2018 Amendments to Sections 9-406 and 9-408 of 
Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, https://cdn.ymaws.com/acrel.site-
ym.com/resource/resmgr/news_and_notes/february_2020/2020-02_toner_-_lessons_from.pdf (last visited Jan. 26, 2022); Florida Bar 
Business Law Section, Exclusion of LLC and Partnership Interests from UCC Article 9 Override: Executive Summary, 
http://www.flabizlaw.org/files/Summary%20and%20Materials%20-%20UCC%209-406%20and%209-
408%20Amendments%20%28v2%29.pdf (last visited Jan. 26, 2022). 
6
 General intangibles do not include accounts, chattel paper, commercial tort claims, deposit accounts, documents, goods, instruments, 
investment property, letter-of-credit rights, letters of credit, money, and oil, gas, or other minerals before extraction. S. 9-102, UCC; S. 
679.1021(1)(pp), F.S. 
7
 “Account debtor” means a person obligated on an account, chattel paper, or general intangible, but does not include a person 
obligated to pay a negotiable instrument. S. 9-102, UCC; s. 679.1021(1)(c), F.S.  
8
 Article 9 does not apply to the outright sale of a complete ownership interest or of governance rights alone.  
9
 Carl S. Bjerre, Daniel S. Kleinberger, Edwin E. Smith, and Steven O. Weise, LLC and Partnership Transfer Restrictions Excluded from 
UCC Article 9 Overrides, https://businesslawtoday.org/2019/02/llc-partnership-transfer-restrictions-excluded-ucc-article-9-overrides/ 
(last visited Jan. 26, 2022).  STORAGE NAME: h0519e.JDC 	PAGE: 3 
DATE: 1/26/2022 
  
A partnership is an association of two or more persons carrying on as co-owners of a business for profit 
formed under s. 620.8202, F.S., or another jurisdiction’s comparable law.
10
 A limited liability company 
(“LLC”) is a business formed or existing under ch. 605, F.S., or a business that becomes subject to that 
chapter by operation of law, formed to protect its members from personal liability for the business’s 
debts or other obligations.
11
 An interest in a partnership or LLC is typically categorized as a general 
intangible as the business owes the interested party rights associated with partnership or membership 
rather than a defined debt.
12
 However, an interest in a partnership or LLC involving economic rights 
may be categorized as a payment intangible.
13
  
 
The Article 9 override may apply where an owner in a partnership or an LLC creates a security interest 
in his or her ownership interest in the business, or some component thereof, even where the business’s 
operating agreement prohibits the owner from doing so.
14
 However, applying the Article 9 override in 
such instances potentially conflicts with the “pick your partner principle” reflected in partnership and 
LLC law, which generally recognizes that an owner in such a business has a substantial stake in 
determining who the co-owners are and should not be forced into doing business with someone the 
owner did not intend to do business with.
15
 The Florida Bar’s Business Law Section illustrates the 
conflict as follows: 
 
Two individuals go into business together and form an LLC. Each owner is a 50/50 
member in the LLC. Their operating agreement (like most operating agreements) 
restricts the ability of one member to convey or encumber his or her membership 
interest without the consent of the other member, in keeping with the “pick your 
partner principle” engrained in LLC and partnership law. If one partner unilaterally 
encumbered his or her 50% membership interest to secure a personal loan from a 
bank (in violation of the operating agreement), then arguably, Section 9-406 and 9-
408 would “override” the restriction in the operating agreement. If the member 
defaulted on the loan, the lender could foreclose on its security interest and take 
ownership of the membership interest. The other member would now be saddled 
with a bank as its new business partner, a result not contemplated or permitted by 
the members’ contract (the operating agreement).
16
  
 
To avoid this conflict, some partnerships and LLCs may attempt to categorize an ownership interest in 
the business as a security, classified by the UCC as “investment property” rather than a general 
intangible or a payment intangible.
17
 This allows the business to opt in to Article 8 of the UCC, 
governing securities, and bypass Article 9 and its override altogether. However, by opting into Article 8, 
the business faces the potential for increased transaction costs and the restructuring of its organization 
documents.
18
  
 
2018 UCC Amendments 
 
In 2018, the ULC and the ALI approved amendments to ss. 9-406 and 9-408 of the UCC to eliminate 
the potential conflict with the “pick your partner principle” (“2018 UCC Amendments”).
19
 Specifically, the 
amendments provide that the Article 9 override does not apply to a security interest in an ownership 
interest in a general or limited partnership or an LLC.
20
 Several states have adopted these amendments 
in their UCC codification statutes, amended their partnership and LLC statutes to achieve a similar 
result, or employed a combination of the two, as follows:
21
 
                                                
10
 S. 620.8101(7), F.S. 
11
 Ss. 605.0102(36) and 605.0304(1), F.S. 
12
 Toner and Havis, supra note 4; Florida Bar Business Law Section, supra note 4.  
13
 Id. 
14
 Bjerre, et al., supra note 8.  
15
 Id.; Florida Bar Business Law Section, supra note 4. 
16
 Florida Bar Business Law Section supra note 4. 
17
 Bjerre, et al., supra note 8; Florida Bar Business Law Section, supra note 4. 
18
 Id. 
19
 Florida Bar Business Law Section, supra note 4. 
20
 Id. 
21
 Id.  STORAGE NAME: h0519e.JDC 	PAGE: 4 
DATE: 1/26/2022 
  
 
State 	Method 	Statutes 
Alabama Amended its LLC and limited partnership 
statutes. 
§§ 10A-5A-1.06 and 10A-9-7.02, Ala. 
Code 
Colorado Amended all applicable statutes.   	§§ 4-9-406, 4-9-408, 7-90-104, Col. Rev. 
Stat. 
Delaware Amended all applicable statutes.  	Title 6, §§ 9-406, 9-408, 15-104, 17-1101, 
and 18-1101, Del. Code Ann. 
Kansas Amended its LLC statute.  	§ 17-76, K.S.A. 
Kentucky Amended its LLC and partnership statutes. §§ 275.255, 362.2-702, 32.1-503, Ky. 
Rev. Stat. 
Maine Amended its LLC statute.  	Title 31, § 1507, Maine Stat.  
North 
Carolina 
Amended its UCC codification and LLC statutes. §§ 25-9-406, 25-9-408, 57D-10-02, N.C. 
Gen. Stat. Ann. 
Ohio Amended its partnership statute. 	§ 1776.49, Ohio Rev. Code Ann. 
Texas Amended all applicable statutes.  	§§ 9.406, 9.408, 101.106, and 154.001, 
Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann. 
Virginia Amended all applicable statutes. 	§§ 8.9A-406, 8.9A-408, 13.1-1001.1, 50-
73.84, Va. Code Ann. 
 
Effect of Proposed Changes 
 
CS/HB 519 amends ss. 679.4061 and 679.4081, F.S., to incorporate the 2018 UCC amendments. 
Specifically, the bill provides that the anti-assignment override provisions set out in those sections do 
not apply to a security interest in an ownership interest in a general partnership, a limited partnership, 
or an LLC. This removes any potential conflict between these sections and the “pick your partner 
principle” by allowing contract terms prohibiting the creation of such security interests to stand and 
promotes the freedom of the owners in a partnership or LLC to contract. 
 
The bill provides an effective date of January 1, 2023. 
 
B. SECTION DIRECTORY: 
Section 1: Amends s. 679.4061, F.S., relating to discharge of account debtor; notification of             
                   assignment; identification and proof of assignment; restrictions on assignment of accounts,  
                   chattel paper, payment intangibles, and promissory notes ineffective.  
Section 2:  Amends s. 679.4081, F.S., relating to restrictions on assignment of promissory notes,  
                   health-care-insurance receivables, and certain general intangibles ineffective. 
Section 3:  Provides an effective date of January 1, 2023.  
 
 
 
   STORAGE NAME: h0519e.JDC 	PAGE: 5 
DATE: 1/26/2022 
  
II.  FISCAL ANALYSIS & ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT 
 
A. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT: 
 
1. Revenues: 
None. 
 
2. Expenditures: 
None. 
 
B. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: 
 
1. Revenues: 
None. 
 
2. Expenditures: 
None. 
 
C. DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT ON PRIVATE SECTOR: 
The bill will allow a contract among business partners or a controlling statute to limit the ability of an 
owner in a partnership or LLC to create a security interest in his or her ownership interest in the 
business. The bill: 
 Protects the investment of the owners in a partnership or LLC in a manner consistent with the 
“pick your partner principle”;  
 May eliminate the need for a partnership or LLC to classify an ownership interest in the 
business as a security, thereby reducing the business’s transaction costs; and  
 May reduce litigation costs related to disputes over the application of the override provisions to 
ownership interests in a partnership or LLC.  
 
D. FISCAL COMMENTS: 
None. 
III.  COMMENTS 
 
A. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES: 
 
 1. Applicability of Municipality/County Mandates Provision: 
Not applicable. The bill does not appear to affect county or municipal governments. 
 
 2. Other: 
None.  
 
B. RULE-MAKING AUTHORITY: 
Not applicable.  
 
C. DRAFTING ISSUES OR OTHER COMMENTS: 
None. 
IV.  AMENDMENTS/COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE CHANGES 
On January 13, 2022, the Civil Justice and Property Rights Subcommittee adopted one amendment and 
reported the bill favorably as a committee substitute. The amendment changed the bill’s effective date from 
July 1, 2022, to January 1, 2023.   STORAGE NAME: h0519e.JDC 	PAGE: 6 
DATE: 1/26/2022 
  
 
This analysis is drafted to the committee substitute as passed by the Civil Justice and Property Rights  
Subcommittee.