The Florida Senate
BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT
(This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.)
Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Children, Families, and Elder Affairs
BILL: SB 1452
INTRODUCER: Senator Book
SUBJECT: Funding for Sheriffs Providing Child Protective Investigative Services
DATE: January 24, 2022
ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR REFERENCE ACTION
1. Moody Cox CF Pre-meeting
2. AHS
3. AP
I. Summary:
SB 1452 authorizes the sheriff’s office who contract with the Department of Children and
Families (DCF) to carry forward documented unexpended funds from one fiscal year to the next,
but the cumulative amount carried forward may not exceed 8 percent of the total contract amount
or grant agreement amount. Any unexpended funds in excess of that amount must be returned to
the DCF.
The funds carried forward:
May not be used to create increased recurring future obligations;
May not be used for any type of program or service that is not currently authorized by the
existing contract or grant agreement with the DCF; and
May be retained through a contract or grant agreement renewal and any new procurements as
long as the same sheriff’s office is retained by the DCF.
All unexpended funds at the expiration of the contract or grant agreement must be returned to the
DCF.
The bill does not impact state expenditures. See Section V. Fiscal Impact Statement.
The bill is effective July 1, 2022.
II. Present Situation:
Current law requires any person who knows or suspects that a child has been abused, abandoned,
or neglected to report such knowledge or suspicion to the Florida central abuse hotline (hotline).
1
A child protective investigation begins if the hotline determines the allegations meet the statutory
1
Section 39.201(1), F.S.
REVISED: BILL: SB 1452 Page 2
definition of abuse,
2
abandonment,
3
or neglect.
4
A child protective investigator (CPI) investigates
the situation either immediately, or within 24 hours after the report is received, depending on the
nature of the allegation.
5
Between October 1, 2020 to September 31, 2021, 168,582 investigations were conducted and
167,813 (99.54%) of the investigations were commenced within 24 hours of receiving the abuse
report.
6
Of the investigations closed within the same period, 240,694 alleged victims were seen
and 224,048 (93.08%) of them were seen within 24 hours of the hotline intake decision date and
time.
7
After conducting an investigation, if the child protective investigator determines that the child is
in need of protection and supervision that necessitates removal, the investigator may initiate
formal proceedings to remove the child from his or her home. When the DCF removes a child
from the home, a series of dependency court proceedings must occur before a child may be
adjudicated dependent.
8
Child Protective Investigators
The DCF employs CPIs who must meet minimum qualifications, including, but not limited to, a
bachelor’s degree, and certification and training requirements.
9
A CPI has certain
responsibilities, including, in part:
Conducting investigations relating to allegations of abuse, abandonment, and/or special
conditions for children;
2
Section 39.01(2), F.S. The term “abuse” means any willful act or threatened act that results in any physical, mental, or
sexual abuse, injury, or harm that causes or is likely to cause the child’s physical, mental, or emotional health to be
significantly impaired. Abuse of a child includes the birth of a new child into a family during the course of an open
dependency case when the parent or caregiver has been determined to lack the protective capacity to safely care for the
children in the home and has not substantially complied with the case plan towards successful reunification or met the
conditions for return of the children into the home. Abuse of a child includes acts or omissions. Corporal discipline of a child
by a parent or legal custodian for disciplinary purposes does not in itself constitute abuse when it does not result in harm to
the child.
3
Section 39.01(1), F.S. The term “abandoned” or “abandonment” means a situation in which the parent or legal custodian of
a child or, in the absence of a parent or legal custodian, the caregiver, while being able, has made no significant contribution
to the child’s care and maintenance or has failed to establish or maintain a substantial and positive relationship with the child,
or both.
4
Sections 39.01(50) and 39.201(2)(a), F.S. “Neglect” occurs when a child is deprived of, or is allowed to be deprived of,
necessary food, clothing, shelter, or medical treatment or a child is permitted to live in an environment when such deprivation
or environment causes the child’s physical, mental, or emotional health to be significantly impaired or to be in danger of
being significantly impaired. The foregoing circumstances shall not be considered neglect if caused primarily by financial
inability unless actual services for relief have been offered to and rejected by such person. A parent or legal custodian
legitimately practicing religious beliefs in accordance with a recognized church or religious organization who thereby does
not provide specific medical treatment for a child may not, for that reason alone, be considered a negligent parent or legal
custodian; however, such an exception does not preclude a court from ordering necessary services.
5
Section 39.101(2), F.S.
6
The DCF, Office of Child Welfare Dashboard, January 10, 2022, available at Child Welfare - Florida Department of
Children and Families (myflfamilies.com) (last visited Jan. 21, 2022).
7
Id.
8
See s. 39.01(14), F.S., for the definition of “child who is found to be dependent”.
9
The DCF, Child Protective Investigator, available at Child Protective Investigator, Employment Opportunities - Florida
Department of Children and Families (myflfamilies.com) (last visited Jan. 21, 2022). BILL: SB 1452 Page 3
Working closely with law enforcement;
Collecting information through observation and interviews with certain persons, including
the children and parents;
Engaging families to understand the family dynamics;
Assessing danger threats, child vulnerabilities and caregiver protective capacities;
Developing present and/or impending danger plans;
Managing and modifying safety plans as necessary during the investigation;
Arranging emergency placement for any child that cannot safely remain in the home;
Notifying the state attorney, law enforcement, child protection team and other required
individuals as appropriate;
Providing written present and impending danger assessments;
Completing Risk Assessment on families investigated and explaining risk score to family;
Conducting staffing’s required for families with risk scores that are High and Very High
Risk;
Providing families with services linkages to agency and community resources;
Conducting initial/ongoing child present and impending danger assessments; and
Developing with the family a signed Present Danger Plan and a signed safety plan.
10
CPIs are required to work nights and weekends to perform their responsibilities and timely
complete their assigned investigations.
11
Contracts with Sheriffs’ Offices
Following a pilot program with the Manatee County Sheriff’s Office, the DCF contracted with
the sheriffs of Pasco County, Manatee County, Broward County, and Pinellas County to provide
all child protective investigation services in their respective counties beginning in FY 1999-20.
12
The following year, the DCF was authorized to enter into grant agreements with sheriffs of other
counties to perform child protective investigations in those counties.
13
The sheriffs of other counties who enter into an agreement with the DCF must:
Adopt the child welfare model that is used by CPIs who are employed by the DCF;
14
Operate in accordance with the performance standards and outcome measures required for
protective investigations that are conducted by the DCF;
15
Operate in compliance with federal performance standards and metrics
16
that are imposed by
federal law, regulation, or funding requirements;
10
Id.
11
Id.
12
Section 39.3065(3)(a), F.S.
13
Id.
14
Id.
15
Section 39.3065(3)(b)1., F.S. The DCF is required to comply with child protection and child welfare outcomes, such as
children are first and foremost protected from abuse and neglect; children are safely maintained in their homes, if possible
and appropriate; services are provided to protect children and prevent removal from their home; and children have
permanency and stability in their living arrangements.
16
Examples of some of the metrics are noted above, such as commencing the investigation and seeing the alleged victim
within 24 hours. BILL: SB 1452 Page 4
Operate in accordance with the same child welfare practice model principals used by, and the
same state performance standards and metrics that are imposed on, child protective
investigators employed by the DCF.
17
Each CPI who is employed by the sheriff must complete the same mandatory training that is
required of CPIs who are employed by the DCF.
18
The DCF and all contracted sheriffs, or his or her designee, must meet at least quarterly to
collaborate on federal and state quality assurance and quality improvement initiatives.
19
The
DCF must conduct an annual performance evaluation of all sheriffs providing services pursuant
to a grant agreement.
20
Current law sets out criteria and standards that must be applied when the
DCF is conducting the annual evaluations.
21
Sheriff Funding for CPI Contracts
Funds for providing child protective investigations must be identified in the annual
appropriations made to the DCF, and the DCF must award grants for the full amount of the
appropriations to the sheriffs’ offices.
22
The DCF is allowed to make advance payments to the
sheriffs for conducting child protective investigations.
23
Funds provided to sheriffs’ offices for
investigations may not be integrated into the sheriffs’ regular budgets, and must be maintained
separately from all other records.
24
The sheriffs’ offices must be reported to the DCF as set out in
the grant agreement.
25
The sheriffs’ offices total contact amount for child protective investigative services is $57.7
million and eight percent of that total is $4.6 million. Over the past three years the sheriffs’
offices have on average returned $1.1 million per year to state General Revenue unallocated.
There is no provision under current law which allows sheriffs’ offices to carry forward any
unexpended funds. Below is a table which summarizes the amounts of unexpended funds each
sheriffs’ offices returned to General Revenue.
17
Section 39.3065(3)(b), F.S.
18
Id.
19
Section 39.3065(3)(d), F.S.
20
Id.
21
Id.
22
Section 39.3065(3)(c), F.S.
23
Id.
24
Id.
25
Section 39.3065(3)(c), F.S. BILL: SB 1452 Page 5
Community-Based Care Lead Agency Funding
Community-based care lead agencies (lead agencies) are responsible for providing services to
children who have been abused, neglected or abandoned and are involved in Florida’s child
welfare system.
26
Section 409.990, F.S., provides for the funding of these lead agencies to
perform such duties and, in part, authorizes a lead agency to carry forward unexpended state
26
See the DCF, Community-Based Care, available at Community Based Care - Florida Department of Children and Families
(myflfamilies.com) (last visited January 23, 2022).
UNEXPENDED FUNDS RETURNED BY SHERIFFS' OFFICES
Sheriff CPI Services Regular Training Title IV-E Training
Vehicle usage/
Mileage
reimbursement/
Miscellaneous
Total
FISCAL YEAR 2020-21
Broward $937,741 $1,605 $92,596 $0 $1,031,942
Hillsborough $133,905 $350 $18,495 $0 $152,750
Manatee $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Pasco $3,928 $0 $0 $17,811 $21,739
Pinellas $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Seminole $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Walton $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY 2020-21 Total $1,075,574 $1,955 $111,091 $17,811 $1,206,431
FISCAL YEAR 2019-20
Broward $355,796 $353 $1,608 $0 $357,757
Hillsborough $230,501 $4,688 $68,124 $13,352 $316,665
Manatee $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Pasco $3,100 $0 $0 $14,675 $17,775
Pinellas $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Seminole $0 $0 $16,238 $0 $16,238
Walton $0 $16,725 ($692) $0 $16,033
FY 2019-20 Total $589,397 $21,766 $85,278 $28,027 $724,468
FISCAL YEAR 2018-19
Broward $844,566 $0 $13,478 $0 $858,044
Hillsborough $139,025 $0 $231,375 $928 $371,328
Manatee $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Pasco $0 $0 $0 $15,091 $15,091
Pinellas $0 $0 $82,489 $0 $82,489
Seminole $0 $0 $62,974 $0 $62,974
Walton $0 $7,734 $17,333 $0 $25,067
FY 2018-19 Total $983,591 $7,734 $407,649 $16,019 $1,414,993 BILL: SB 1452 Page 6
funds from one fiscal year to the next, but the cumulative amount must not exceed 8 percent of
the total contract with the DCF. Any excess funds must be returned to the DCF.
27
The funds that are carried forward may not be used to increase recurring future obligations, and
may not be used for any program or services that are not authorized under the contract with the
DCF. Expenditures of funds carried forward must be separately reported to the DCF. Any funds
at the end of a contract period must be returned, but funds carried forward may be retained
through any contract renewal provided the same lead agency is contracted with the DCF.
28
III. Effect of Proposed Changes:
The bill provides that the sheriffs who are contracted with the DCF to provide child protective
services may carry forward documented unexpended funds from one fiscal year to the next, but
the cumulative amount carried forward may not exceed 8 percent of the total contract or grant
agreement amount. Any unexpended funds in excess of that amount must be returned to the
DCF.
The funds that are carried forward may not be used to create increased recurring future
obligations or for any program or service that is not currently authorized by the existing contract
or grant agreement with the DCF. The funds carried forward must be separately reported to the
DCF. Funds carried forward may be retained through a contract or grant agreement renewal and
any new procurements as long as the same sheriff’s office is retained by the DCF. All
unexpended funds at the expiration of the contract or grant agreement must be returned to the
DCF.
The bill is effective July 1, 2022
IV. Constitutional Issues:
A. Municipality/County Mandates Restrictions:
The bill does not appear to require cities and counties to expend funds or limit their
authority to raise revenue or receive state-shared revenues as specified by Article VII,
Section 18 of the Florida Constitution.
B. Public Records/Open Meetings Issues:
None.
C. Trust Funds Restrictions:
None.
D. State Tax or Fee Increases:
None.
27
Section 409.990(5), F.S.
28
Id. BILL: SB 1452 Page 7
E. Other Constitutional Issues:
None identified.
V. Fiscal Impact Statement:
A. Tax/Fee Issues:
None.
B. Private Sector Impact:
None.
C. Government Sector Impact:
The bill does not impact state expenditures. However, the bill allows each sheriff’s office
that provides child protective investigative services to carry forward documented
unexpended funds up to eight percent of the total contract amount, from one fiscal year to
the next. Unexpended funds in excess of eight percent must be returned to the state
general revenue unallocated. Currently, all unexpended funds are returned to the state
general revenue unallocated. The sheriffs’ offices total contact amount for child
protective investigative services is $57.7 million and eight percent of that total is $4.6
million. Over the past three years the sheriffs’ offices have on average returned $1.1
million per year to state general revenue unallocated.
Annual
Contract
Amount
8% of Annual
Contract Amount
3-Year Average
Reversion
Broward $15,201,864 $1,216,149 $749,248
Hillsborough $13,738,700 $1,099,096 $280,248
Manatee $4,855,360 $388,429 $0
Pasco $6,466,825 $517,346 $18,202
Pinellas $11,915,854 $953,268 $27,496
Seminole $4,633,803 $370,704 $26,404
Walton $860,607 $68,849 $13,700
Total $57,673,013 $4,613,841 $1,115,297
VI. Technical Deficiencies:
None.
VII. Related Issues:
None. BILL: SB 1452 Page 8
VIII. Statutes Affected:
This bill substantially amends section 39.3065 of the Florida Statutes.
IX. Additional Information:
A. Committee Substitute – Statement of Changes:
(Summarizing differences between the Committee Substitute and the prior version of the bill.)
None.
B. Amendments:
None.
This Senate Bill Analysis does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill’s introducer or the Florida Senate.