The Florida Senate
BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT
(This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.)
Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Community Affairs
BILL: CS/SB 1096
INTRODUCER: Governmental Oversight and Accountability Committee and Senator Martin
SUBJECT: Monuments and Memorials
DATE: April 3, 2023
ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR REFERENCE ACTION
1. Limones-Borja McVaney GO Fav/CS
2. Hunter Ryon CA Pre-meeting
3. RC
Please see Section IX. for Additional Information:
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE - Substantial Changes
I. Summary:
CS/SB 1096 creates the “Historical Monuments and Memorials Protection Act.” The bill defines
the term “memorial” to mean a plaque, statue, marker, flag, banner, cenotaph, religious symbol,
painting, seal, tombstone, structure name, or display that is constructed, placed or located with
the intent of being permanently displayed or perpetually maintained, that is dedicated to a
historical person, entity, event, or series of events, and that honors or recounts the military
service of any past or present military personnel or the past or present public service of a resident
of the geographical area comprising this state or the United States of America. The bill defines
the term “monument” to mean a permanent structure such as a marker, statue, sculpture, plaque,
or other artifice, including living plant material, places in remembrance or recognition of a
significant person or event in Florida History.
The bill provides that any person or entity that damages, defaces, destroys, or removes a
monument or memorial located on publicly owned property may be subject to civil liability, and
for which they may be required to pay treble damages and punitive damages. A person or entity
authorized to alter, move, repair, or replace the monument or memorial is exempt from punitive
liability.
Any public entity that owns a monument or memorial, any legal resident of this state, or any
entity whose purpose is historic preservation is granted standing to bring a civil action for its
damages relating to the damage, defacement, destruction, or removal of a monument or
REVISED: BILL: CS/SB 1096 Page 2
memorial, or for the willful and malicious destruction or demolition of a memorial or historic
property.
The bill does not prevent an agency from relocating a monument or memorial when relocation is
necessary for the construction, expansion, or alternation of any publicly owned building, roads,
streets, highways, or other transportation projects. However, if a monument or memorial is
relocated, it must be relocated to a site of similar prominence, honor, visibility, and access within
the same county or municipality in which it was originally.
The bill requires any plaque, sign, picture, notice or any other object used to convey information
to have written approval by the Secretary of State before being placed on or near a monument or
memorial in existence on or before January 1, 2022.
The bill takes effect July 1, 2023.
II. Present Situation:
Memorials
The Florida Arts and Culture Act
1
(Act) recognizes the vast cultural resources available in the
state and is intended to provide state support for, and gain national and international recognition
of, efforts, works, and performances of Florida artists, agencies, museums, and nonprofits.
2
The
Act designates the Secretary of State as chief cultural officer of the state, and creates the division
of state arts administrative agency (Division) to administer federal arts funding, award grants,
and consult with and advise individuals, groups, organizations, and agencies and officials
concerning the acquisition of fine arts.
3
The Division also sponsors and promotes performances
and exhibits, conducts cultural programs and exchanges, and accepts funding and support for its
purposes.
4
Criminal Penalty for Destruction of a Memorial
Section 806.135, F.S., provides that it is a second degree felony
5
for any person to willfully and
maliciously destroy or demolish any memorial or historic property, or willfully and maliciously
pull down a memorial or historic property, unless authorized by the owner of the memorial or the
historic property.
The term “historic property” is defined as any building, structure, site, or object that has been
officially designated as a historic building, historic structure, historic site, or historic object
through a federal, state, or local designation program. A “memorial” is defined as a plaque,
statue, marker, flag, banner, cenotaph, religious symbol, painting, seal, tombstone, structure
name, or display that is constructed and located with the intent of being permanently displayed or
perpetually maintained; is dedicated to a historical person, an entity, an event, or a series of
1
Sections 265.281-265.703, F.S., comprise the Florida Arts and Culture Act. See, s. 265.281, F.S.
2
Section 265.282, F.S.
3
Section 265.284, F.S.
4
Id.
5
A second degree felony is punishable by up to 15 years imprisonment and a $10,000 fine. Sections 775.082(9)(a)3.c. and
775.083(1)(b), F.S. BILL: CS/SB 1096 Page 3
events; and honors or recounts the military service of any past or present United States Armed
Forces military personnel, or the past or present public service of a resident of the geographical
area comprising the state or the United States. The term includes, but is not limited to, the
following memorials established under ch. 265, F.S.:
Florida Women’s Hall of Fame;
Florida Medal of Honor Wall;
Florida Veterans’ Hall of Fame;
POW-MIA Chair of Honor Memorial;
Florida Veterans’ Walk of Honor and Florida Veterans’ Memorial Garden;
Florida Law Enforcement Officers’ Hall of Fame;
Florida Holocaust Memorial;
Florida Slavery Memorial; and
Any other memorial located within the Capitol Complex, including, but not limited to,
Waller Park.
Section 806.135, F.S, also requires the payment of restitution, which includes the full cost of
repair or replacement of such memorial or historic property.
Monuments
Section 265.111, F.S., defines “monument” to mean a permanent structure such as a marker,
statue, sculpture, plaque, or other artifice, including living plant material, placed in remembrance
or recognition of a significant person or event in Florida history.
Standing in Litigation
For standing, Florida courts require the party prosecuting the claim to be the real party in interest
or be expressly authorized by statute to bring the claim on behalf of the real party in interest.
Rule 1.210 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
(a) Parties Generally. Every action may be prosecuted in the name of the
real party in interest, but . . . a party expressly authorized by statute may
sue in that person's own name without joining the party for whose benefit
the action is brought. All persons having an interest in the subject of the
action and in obtaining the relief demanded may join as plaintiffs and any
person may be made a defendant who has or claims an interest adverse to
the plaintiff. Any person may at any time be made a party if that person's
presence is necessary or proper to a complete determination of the cause.
Persons having a united interest may be joined on the same side as plaintiffs
or defendants, and anyone who refuses to join may for such reason be made
a defendant.
BILL: CS/SB 1096 Page 4
Civil Liability and Damages
The State Constitution provides that “the courts shall be open to every person for redress of any
injury, and justice shall be administered without sale, denial, or delay.”
6
In most instances, the
aggrieved party is limited to sue for the actual damages incurred.
7
Treble damages
A statute may subject a person to civil liability for damages caused by the person’s criminal
behavior. “Civil liability” is defined in Black’s Law Dictionary as the “debt or legal obligation
from a private wrong amounting to the damage done.”
8
“Treble damages” are damages provided
by statute in certain cases found by a jury, where the damages to be paid are triple the amount of
damage actually caused.
9
Punitive damages
In any civil action, no claim for punitive damages is permitted unless there is a reasonable
showing by evidence in the record, or proffered by the claimant, which would provide a
reasonable basis for recovery of such damages.
10
A defendant may only be held liable for
punitive damages if the trier of fact finds the defendant was personally guilty of intentional
misconduct
11
or gross negligence.
12,13
Punitive damages may not exceed the greater of:
Three times the amount of compensatory damages awarded to each claimant entitled thereto,
consistent with the remaining provisions of the section; or
The sum of $500,000.
14
If the fact finder determines that the wrongful conduct proven under this section was motivated
solely by unreasonable financial gain the court may award an amount of punitive damages not to
exceed the greater of:
Four times the amount of compensatory damages awarded to each claimant entitled thereto,
consistent with the remaining provisions of the section; or
The sum of $2 million.
15
If the fact finder determines that, at the time of injury, the defendant had a specific intent to harm
the claimant and the defendant’s conduct did in fact harm the claimant, then there shall be no cap
on punitive damages.
16
6
FLA. CONST. art. I, s. 21.
7
See, e.g., Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Fla. v. State, 115 So.3d 261, 282 (Fla. 2013).
8
“Civil Liability,” Black's Law Dictionary 435 (9th ed. 2009).
9
“Treble Damages,” Black's Law Dictionary 435 (9th ed. 2009).
10
Section 768.72(1), F.S.
11
“Intentional misconduct” means that the defendant had actual knowledge of the wrongfulness of the conduct and the high
probability that injury or damage to the claimant would result and, despite that knowledge, intentionally pursued that course
of conduct, resulting in injury or damage. Section 768.72(2)(a), F.S.
12
“Gross negligence” means that the defendant’s conduct was so reckless or wanting in care that it constituted a conscious
disregard or indifference to the life, safety, or rights of persons exposed to such conduct. Section 768.72(2)(b), F.S.
13
Section 768.72(2), F.S.
14
Section 768.72(1)(a), F.S.
15
Section 768.73(1)(b), F.S.
16
Section 768.73(1)(c), F.S. BILL: CS/SB 1096 Page 5
III. Effect of Proposed Changes:
Section 1 creates the “Historical Monuments and Memorials Protection Act.”
Section 2 amends s. 265.283, F.S., to define the term “memorial” to mean a plaque, statue,
marker, flag, banner, cenotaph, religious symbol, painting, seal, tombstone, structure name, or
display that:
Is constructed, placed or located with the intent of being permanently displayed or
perpetually maintained;
Is dedicated to a historical person, entity, event, or series of events; and
Honors or recounts:
o The military service of any past or present military personnel; or
o The past or present public service of a resident of the geographical area comprising this
state or the United States of America.
Section 2 also defines the term “monument” to mean a permanent structure such as a marker,
statue, sculpture, plaque, or other artifice, including living plant material, places in remembrance
or recognition of a significant person or event in Florida History.
Section 3 creates s. 265.710, F.S., to allow a civil action against a person or entity that damages,
defaces, destroys, or removes a monument or memorial that is displayed on publically owned
property or for willfully and maliciously destroying or demolishing a memorial or historic
property. The person or entity who commits such act may be liable for three times the full cost to
return, repair, or replace the monument or memorial, and may be subject to punitive damages;
unless the person or entity was authorized to alter, move, repair, or replace the monument or
memorial by the public entity that owns it. Although it is not specifically stated in the bill, the
right to collect such damages is generally limited to a harmed party—such as the owner of the
monument or memorial that is damaged or destroyed.
Section 3 also grants any public entity that owns a monument or memorial (not necessarily the
monument or memorial damaged, defaced, destroyed, or removed), any legal resident of this
state, or any entity whose purpose is historic preservation the right to bring a civil action for
damages in the circuit court in the county in which the monument or memorial was damaged,
defaced, destroyed, or removed or for any act prohibited by s. 806.135, F.S. But see VII. Related
Issues below.
A person may be found guilty of a criminal and civil violation based on the same underlying
facts. Therefore, a person or entity who damages, defaces, destroys, or removes a monument or
memorial may be subject to both a criminal penalty and restitution pursuant to s. 806.135, F.S.,
and the civil penalties imposed pursuant to this bill.
Section 3 does not prevent an agency from relocating a monument or memorial when relocation
is necessary for the construction, expansion, or alteration of any publicly owned building, roads,
streets, highways, or other transportation projects. Section 3 requires that the monument or
memorial that is relocated must be relocated to a site of similar prominence, honor, visibility, and
access within the same county or municipality as its original placement.
BILL: CS/SB 1096 Page 6
Section 3 requires any plaque, sign, picture, notice or any other object used to convey
information must have written approval by the Secretary of State before being placed on or near
a monument or memorial in existence on or before January 1, 2022.
Section 4 provides the bill takes effect July 1, 2023.
IV. Constitutional Issues:
A. Municipality/County Mandates Restrictions:
Not applicable. The bill does not require counties and municipalities to spend funds,
reduce counties’ or municipalities’ ability to raise revenue, or reduce the percentage of
state tax shared with counties and municipalities.
B. Public Records/Open Meetings Issues:
None.
C. Trust Funds Restrictions:
None.
D. State Tax or Fee Increases:
None.
E. Other Constitutional Issues:
Lines 126 through 133 require a monument or memorial to be relocated to certain types
of locations. If the memorial or monument is owned by a private party, this requirement
may infringe upon the property owner’s rights of possession. This may be deemed a
“taking” by the government and be subject to “just compensation.”
Lines 134 through 137 require express written approval by the Secretary of State prior to
a plaque, sign, picture, notice, or any other object used to convey information being
placed on or near a monument or memorial in existence on or before January 1, 2022.
Not all monuments and memorials are owned by governmental entities or located on
public property. Thus, this requirement may infringe upon the property rights of the
owner of the monument or memorial or the owner of the property upon which the
monument or memorial is located.
Moreover, monuments and memorials are typically located in parks and other public
places. These parks and public areas may be deemed “public forums” for free speech
considerations. Thus, the requirement of the Secretary of State’s approval may infringe
upon a citizen’s free speech rights. BILL: CS/SB 1096 Page 7
V. Fiscal Impact Statement:
A. Tax/Fee Issues:
None.
B. Private Sector Impact:
None.
C. Government Sector Impact:
The Department of State may incur workload costs associated with any requests to place
a plaque, sign, picture, notice, or any other object used to convey information on or near a
monument or memorial in existence on or before January 1, 2022. This increased
workload should be absorbed within current agency resources.
VI. Technical Deficiencies:
None.
VII. Related Issues:
Lines 113 through 125 address potential litigation against persons who damage, deface, destroy
or remove a monument displayed on publicly owned property.
Subsection (1) (lines 113 through 119) increases the civil liability of the “bad actor” to treble
damages (based on the full cost to return, repair, or replace the monument, and punitive
damages). If the person is found liable for these damages, the damages appear to be payable to
the owner of the monument or memorial.
Subsection (2) (lines 120 through 125) grants standing to parties other than the injured property
owner. This language could be interpreted two ways. The first interpretation is that these parties
are granted standing to sue on behalf of the injured property owner. This appears consistent with
Rule 1.210 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. If the party is successful in the suit, the
damages would be payable to the injured property owner. The second interpretation is that these
parties are granted standing to seek redress based on the damages to those particular parties
(rather than the injured property owner). In this case, the treble and punitive damages may not
apply. Given that (at least) two interpretations can be made, consideration should be given to
clarifying the language so that the intended interpretation is understood.
Lines 113 through 117 make a person or entity liable for treble damages and punitive damages
for any act that damages, defaces, destroys, or removes certain monuments or memorials. This
liability does not distinguish between negligent acts and intentional acts. Typically, Florida law
imposes treble or punitive damages when the act is criminal, gross negligence, or performed with
knowledge or intention. This bill appears to subject a negligent act to treble damages.
BILL: CS/SB 1096 Page 8
Lines 117 through 119 provide an exception to a party’s punitive liability if the public entity
owning the monument or memorial authorized certain actions. This exception to punitive
damages suggests that even a person or entity authorized to alter, move, repair, or replace the
monument or memorial may be liable for treble damages (rather than actual damages) if the
person or entity (regardless of intent) damages, defaces, destroys, or removes a monument or
memorial. In most instances, such damages would be addressed in a contract between the parties.
VIII. Statutes Affected:
This bill substantially amends section 265.283 of the Florida Statutes.
This bill creates section 265.710 of the Florida Statutes.
IX. Additional Information:
A. Committee Substitute – Statement of Substantial Changes:
(Summarizing differences between the Committee Substitute and the prior version of the bill.)
CS by Governmental Oversight and Accountability on March 15, 2023:
The committee substitute defines the term “monument” to mean a permanent structure
such as a marker, statue, sculpture, plaque, or other artifice, including living plant
material, places in remembrance or recognition of a significant person or event in Florida
History.
B. Amendments:
None.
This Senate Bill Analysis does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill’s introducer or the Florida Senate.