This docum ent does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives.
STORAGE NAME: h0117.CRJ
DATE: 1/17/2024
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS
BILL #: HB 117 Disclosure of Grand Jury Testimony
SPONSOR(S): Gossett-Seidman
TIED BILLS: IDEN./SIM. BILLS: CS/SB 234
REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or
BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF
1) Criminal Justice Subcommittee Leshko Hall
2) Ethics, Elections & Open Government
Subcommittee
3) Judiciary Committee
SUMMARY ANALYSIS
Section 905.24, F.S., requires grand jury proceedings to be kept secret. Section 905.27, F.S., prohibits any
person present or appearing during a grand jury proceeding, including a grand juror, state attorney, assistant
state attorney, court reporter, stenographer, or interpreter from disclosing the testimony of a witness examined
before the grand jury or other evidence received by the grand jury. A court may authorize disclosure of such
testimony for the following purposes: ascertaining whether it is consistent with the testimony given by the
witness before the court; determining whether the witness is guilty of perjury; or furthering justice.
It is unlawful for any person to knowingly publish, broadcast, disclose, divulge, or communicate to any other
person, or knowingly cause or permit to be published, broadcasted, disclosed, divulged, or communicated to
any other person, in any manner whatsoever, any testimony of a witness examined before the grand jury, or
the content, gist, or import thereof, except when such testimony is or has been disclosed in a criminal or civil
proceeding. If the court orders the disclosure of grand jury testimony in a criminal or civil case, the testimony
may only be disclosed to specified persons and can only be used in the defense or prosecution of the civil or
criminal case and for no other purpose whatsoever. A person who illegally discloses grand jury testimony
commits a first-degree misdemeanor and such a violation constitutes criminal contempt of court.
HB 117 amends s. 905.27, F.S., to specify that when a court is considering whether to authorize the disclosure
of grand jury testimony for the purpose of furthering justice, it may consider whether such disclosure would
further a public interest when the disclosure is requested by the media or an interested person, regardless of
whether that purpose is for use in a criminal or civil case, and:
The subject of the grand jury inquiry is deceased;
The grand jury inquiry related to criminal or sexual activity between a subject of the grand jury
investigation and a person who at the time was a minor;
The testimony was previously disclosed by a court order; and
The state attorney is provided notice of the request.
The bill specifies that nothing in the new disclosure provisions created by the bill hinders the court’s ability to
limit the disclosure of grand jury testimony, including, but not limited to, redaction.
Additionally, the bill prohibits the custodian of a grand jury record from disclosing the testimony of a witness
examined before the grand jury or other evidence received by the grand jury.
The bill may have an indeterminate negative fiscal impact on clerk’s offices as their workload may increase if
additional records are ordered to be released, some requiring redactions. However, the records affected by the
bill are very limited and, as such, any additional costs will likely be absorbed within existing resources.
The bill provides an effective date of July 1, 2024. STORAGE NAME: h0117.CRJ PAGE: 2
DATE: 1/17/2024
FULL ANALYSIS
I. SUBSTANTIVE ANALYSIS
A. EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGES:
Background
Section 905.24, F.S., requires grand jury proceedings to be kept secret. A grand jury’s primary role is to
determine whether sufficient evidence exists to justify indicting an accused individual.
1
To make such
determinations, a grand jury also serves as an investigating body with subpoena powers.
2
In Florida, a
grand jury indictment is only required to try a person for a capital offense; i.e., one where the death
penalty may be given.
3
For all other offenses, the state attorney may choose to proceed by either filing
an information
4
or seeking a grand jury indictment.
5
While an information is routinely used to charge
individuals in Florida, grand juries are often utilized for controversial cases such as those involving
alleged wrongdoing by public officials.
6
Who May be Present During Grand Jury Sessions
Section 905.17, F.S., provides that no person shall be present at grand jury sessions except:
The witness under examination;
One attorney representing the witness;
The state attorney and his or her assistant state attorneys;
The court reporter or stenographer; and
An interpreter.
7
An attorney representing a witness under examination is permitted to advise and counsel the witness,
but may not address the grand jurors, raise objections, make arguments, or otherwise disrupt
proceedings before the grand jury. A witness’s attorney is subject to the prohibition against disclosing
grand jury testimony or other evidence received by the grand jury under s. 905.27, F.S.
8
Any stenographic records, notes, and transcriptions made by the court reporter or stenographer are
filed with the clerk who must keep them in a sealed container not subject to public inspection. Such
records, notes, and transcriptions are confidential and exempt from public record requirements under s.
119.071(1), F.S., and s. 24(a), art. I, Fla. Const., and may only be released upon a request from the
grand jury for use by the grand jury or by order of the court pursuant to s. 905.27, F.S.
9
Prohibitions on Grand Jury Testimony Disclosure and Exceptions
Section 905.27, F.S., prohibits any person present or appearing during a grand jury proceeding,
including a grand juror, state attorney, assistant state attorney, court reporter, stenographer, or
interpreter from disclosing the testimony of a witness examined before the grand jury or other evidence
received by the grand jury. A court may authorize disclosure of such testimony for the following
purposes:
Ascertaining whether it is consistent with the testimony given by the witness before the court;
Determining whether the witness is guilty of perjury; or
1
S. 905.16, F.S.
2
S. 905.185, F.S.
3
S. 15(a), art. I, Fla. Const.
4
An “information” is a formal criminal charge made by a prosecutor without a grand-jury indictment. Black’s Law Dictionary (3d pocket
ed. 2006).
5
S. 15(a), art. I, Fla. Const.; The Florida Bar, The Grand Jury, https://www.floridabar.org/news/resources/rpt-hbk/#1619193085264-
69d9d83a-2799 (last visited Jan. 13, 2024).
6
Id.
7
S. 905.17(1), F.S.
8
S. 905.17(2), F.S.
9
S. 905.17(1), F.S. STORAGE NAME: h0117.CRJ PAGE: 3
DATE: 1/17/2024
Furthering justice.
10
It is unlawful for any person to knowingly publish, broadcast, disclose, divulge, or communicate to any
other person, or knowingly cause or permit to be published, broadcasted, disclosed, divulged, or
communicated to any other person, in any manner whatsoever, any testimony of a witness examined
before the grand jury, or the content, gist, or import thereof, except when such testimony is or has been
disclosed in a criminal or civil proceeding as authorized.
11
When a court orders the disclosure of grand jury testimony for use in a criminal case, it may be
disclosed to the:
Prosecuting attorney of the court in which such criminal case is pending;
Prosecuting attorney’s assistants, legal associates, and employees;
Defendant;
Defendant’s attorney; and
Defendant’s attorney’s legal associates and employees.
When a court orders the disclosure of grand jury testimony for use in a civil case, it may be disclosed to
all parties to the case and to their attorneys and their attorneys’ legal associates and employees.
However, the grand jury testimony released by court order can only be used in the defense or
prosecution of the civil or criminal case and for no other purpose whatsoever.
12
Any person who illegally discloses grand jury testimony commits a first-degree misdemeanor
13
and
such a violation constitutes criminal contempt of court.
14
Jeffrey Epstein Grand Jury Testimony
In 2006, Palm Beach County police opened an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein regarding allegations
of sexual abuse of minors. Following the investigation, Palm Beach County police asked the state
attorney to charge Epstein with four felony charges including unlawful sexual activity with a minor and
lewd and lascivious molestation. Although the state attorney had the authority to file such charges by
an information, Epstein’s case was instead sent to a grand jury.
15
The grand jury ultimately only found
sufficient evidence to charge Epstein with one count of misdemeanor soliciting a prostitute.
16
In 2021, the Palm Beach Post sued the state attorney and clerk’s office in an attempt to obtain a court-
ordered release of the grand jury testimony in Epstein’s case, seeking the disclosure for the purpose of
furthering justice, however, the presiding judge ruled against the Post and the testimony was not
released.
17
The Palm Beach Post subsequently appealed this decision to the Fourth District Court of
Appeal (DCA) which ultimately reversed and remanded the case for further proceedings in the trial
court. The Fourth DCA ordered that upon remand the trial court conduct an in camera inspection
18
of
the grand jury testimony and determine whether disclosing such testimony would further justice. The
Fourth DCA further held that if the trial court found such disclosure would further justice that the trial
court had the inherent authority to disclose such testimony.
19
The trial court has since ordered
transcription of the grand jury testimony to assist in facilitating an effective review of the materials.
20
10
S. 905.27(1), F.S.
11
S. 905.27(2), F.S.
12
Id.
13
A first-degree misdemeanor under this section is punishable as provided in s. 775.083, or by a fine not exceeding $5,000, or both.
14
S. 905.27(4-5), F.S.
15
Holly Baltz, Why was Jeffrey Epstein in 2006 charged only with picking up a prostitute? Where we stand, Palm Beach Daily News,
Feb. 10, 2023, https://news.yahoo.com/why-jeffrey-epstein-2006-charged-100257919.html?ref=upstract.com (last visited Jan.13, 2024).
16
Soliciting another person to commit prostitution is a first-degree misdemeanor for a first violation. S. 796.07(5)(a), F.S.
17
Terri Parker, Palm Beach County Clerk of Courts working to unseal Jeffrey Epstein grand jury transcripts, ABC 25 WPBF News,
https://www.wpbf.com/article/palm-beach-county-clerk-courts-working-unseal-jeffrey-epstein-grand-jury-transcripts/38699982 (last
visited Jan. 13, 2024).
18
“In camera inspection” means a trial judge’s private consideration of evidence. Black’s Law Dictionary (3d pocket ed. 2006).
19
CA Florida Holdings, LLC v. Dave Aronberg and Joseph Abruzzo, 4D22-293, (Fla. 4th DCA May 10, 2023).
20
Order Directing Transcription of the Testimony in the Grand Jury Proceedings, CA Florida Holdings, LLC v. Dave Aronberg and
Joseph Abruzzo, 50-2019CA-014681 (15th Cir. June 29, 2023). STORAGE NAME: h0117.CRJ PAGE: 4
DATE: 1/17/2024
Effected of Proposed Changes
HB 117 amends s. 905.27, F.S., to specify that when a court is considering whether to authorize the
disclosure of grand jury testimony for the purpose of furthering justice, it may consider whether such
disclosure would further a public interest when the disclosure is requested by the media or an
interested person, regardless of whether that purpose is for use in a criminal or civil case, and:
The subject of the grand jury inquiry is deceased;
The grand jury inquiry related to criminal or sexual activity between a subject of the grand jury
investigation and a person who at the time was a minor;
The testimony was previously disclosed by a court order; and
The state attorney is provided notice of the request.
The bill specifies that nothing in the new disclosure provisions created by the bill hinders the court’s
ability to limit the disclosure of grand jury testimony, including, but not limited to, redaction.
The bill also includes the custodian of a grand jury record among the individuals who are prohibited
from disclosing the testimony of a witness examined before the grand jury or other evidence received
by the grand jury.
The bill provides an effective date of July 1, 2024.
B. SECTION DIRECTORY:
Section 1: Amends s. 905.27, F.S., relating to testimony not to be disclosed; exceptions.
Section 2: Reenacts s. 905.17, F.S., relating to who may be present during session of grand jury.
Section 3: Provides an effective date of July 1, 2024.
II. FISCAL ANALYSIS & ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT
A. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT:
1. Revenues:
None.
2. Expenditures:
See Fiscal Comments.
B. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:
1. Revenues:
None.
2. Expenditures:
See Fiscal Comments.
C. DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT ON PRIVATE SECTOR:
None.
D. FISCAL COMMENTS:
The bill may have an indeterminate negative fiscal impact on clerk’s offices as their workload may
increase if additional records are ordered to be released, some requiring redactions. However, the
records affected by the bill are very limited and, as such, any additional costs will likely be absorbed
within existing resources. STORAGE NAME: h0117.CRJ PAGE: 5
DATE: 1/17/2024
III. COMMENTS
A. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES:
1. Applicability of Municipality/County Mandates Provision:
Not Applicable. This bill does not appear to require counties or municipalities to spend funds or take
action requiring the expenditures of funds; reduce the authority that counties or municipalities have
to raise revenues in the aggregate; or reduce the percentage of state tax shared with counties or
municipalities.
2. Other:
None.
B. RULE-MAKING AUTHORITY:
None.
C. DRAFTING ISSUES OR OTHER COM MENTS:
None.
IV. AMENDMENTS/COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE CHANGES