STORAGE NAME: h0301f.JDC
DATE: 4/8/2025
1
FLORIDA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
BILL ANALYSIS
This bill analysis was prepared by nonpartisan committee staff and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.
BILL #: CS/HB 301
TITLE: Suits Against the Government
SPONSOR(S): McFarland
COMPANION BILL: SB 1570 (DiCeglie)
LINKED BILLS: None
RELATED BILLS: None
Committee References
Civil Justice & Claims
17 Y, 1 N
Budget
25 Y, 3 N
Judiciary
19 Y, 3 N, As CS
SUMMARY
Effect of the Bill:
CS/HB 301 increases the existing caps on the recovery of awards against a governmental entity. For a claim that
accrues between October 1, 2025, and September 30, 2030, the cap is increased to $500,000 per person from
$200,000 and the cap for multiple claims or judgments arising out of the same incident is increased to $1,000,000
from $300,000; the bill provides for one automatic increase in the caps for claims accruing on or after October 1,
2030. The limitations of liability in effect on the date the claim accrues apply to the claim.
The bill permits a subdivision of the state to settle a claim or judgment in excess of the caps without requiring the
subdivision to seek further action by the Legislature.
The bill prohibits an insurance policy, beginning October 1, 2025, from conditioning the payment of benefits or the
coverage of liability on the enactment of a claim bill. The bill also revises certain statutes of limitation and presuit
procedures for certain types of claims against government entities.
Fiscal or Economic Impact:
The bill will likely have an indeterminate, significant negative fiscal impact on state and local governments.
JUMP TO SUMMARY ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY
ANALYSIS
EFFECT OF THE BILL:
Statutory Caps
CS/HB 301 amends s. 768.28, F.S., relating to the state’s limited waiver of sovereign immunity which allows for
suits in tort against the state and its agencies and subdivisions, subject to statutory caps. The bill increases the
statutory caps on judgments against the state or an agency or subdivision thereof on a graduated basis. For
claims accruing between October 1, 2025, and September 30, 2030, the caps are increased from $200,000 per
person and $300,000 per incident to $500,000 per person and $1,000,000 per incident. The bill includes a one-
time automatic increase to the caps beginning on October 1, 2030, to $600,000 per person and $1,100,000 per
incident. (Section 1).
The bill clarifies that when determining liability limits for a claim, the caps in effect on the date the claim accrues
will apply to the underlying claim. (Section 1).
Settlement of Claims or Judgments Which Exceed Statutory Caps
The bill permits a subdivision of the state, which includes a county, city, municipality, special district, or other
similar entity to choose to settle a claim or judgment which exceeds the caps without seeking further action by the
Legislature. Thus, if a subdivision wishes to pay a judgment rendered against it in excess of the caps, it may do so
without going through the claim bill process and, ultimately, without seeking legislative approval. (Section 1). JUMP TO SUMMARY ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY
2
Insurance Policies
The bill prohibits an insurance policy from conditioning the liability coverage or the payment of benefits on the
enactment of a claim bill. Specifically, an insurance policy may not be issued or delivered to the state, a state
agency, or a subdivision of the state, which conditions the coverage or satisfaction of benefits on the matter going
through the legislative claim bill process. Any such provision in a policy will be null and void. This prohibition
applies to any insurance policy issued for delivery or delivered on or after October 1, 2025. (Section 1).
Timeframes for Filing an Action
The bill changes the current general four-year statute of limitations or filing a claim against the state or its
agencies or subdivisions to the following timeframes:
For claims based on negligence: the claim must be filed within two years.
1
For claims based on contribution: the claim must be filed within the limitations established in s. 768.31(4),
F.S.
For claims based on medical malpractice or wrongful death: the claim must be filed within the limitations
established in s. 95.11(4), F.S.
For claims based on sexual battery on a victim under 16: the claim may be filed at any time; however, this
does not resuscitate any claims that may have already been time barred by previous statutes of limitations.
For any other claim: the claim must be filed within four years. (Section 1).
To accommodate these changes in the statutes of limitations, the bill decreases the allotted presuit notice period
for a claimant to present the required written notice of the claim to the appropriate agency from three years to 18
months. Similarly, the bill decreases the time period in which a claimant must present written notice of a claim for
wrongful death from two years to 18 months. However, if the claim is based on a sexual battery of a victim under
the age of 16, in violation of s. 794.011, the claimant may present written notice of the claim at any time. (Section
1).
The bill also decreases from six months to four months the time period in which the Department of Financial
Services (DFS) or the appropriate agency must dispose of a presuit notice of a claim. As such, the responding
agency must dispose of a claim within four months of a claim being filed or it is deemed a final denial (thus
allowing the claimant to move forward with a civil suit). However, the bill does not change the time period by
which an agency must dispose of a claim for medical malpractice or wrongful death. As such, a final disposition for
a claim made for medical malpractice or wrongful death must still be made within 90 days from the date of filing or
it is deemed a final denial of the claim. (Section 1).
The bill provides that the statute of limitations for all prospective defendants, not just those in medical malpractice
or wrongful death actions, is tolled for the period of time taken by the agency to deny the claim.
2 (Section 1).
The bill amends s. 944.713(2), F.S., clarifying that the maximum amount for which a private vendor that contracts
to build, lease, or operate a correctional facility must indemnify the state for certain incurred liabilities is the
amount of the sovereign immunity caps as provided in the bill. (Section 2).
The bill reenacts a number of statutes for the purpose of incorporating the changes made by the language of the
bill. (Sections 3-61).
The bill has an effective date of October 1, 2025. (Section 62).
1
This two-year period is the same as the statute of limitations for bringing a negligence claim against a private party. See s.
95.11(4)(a), F.S.
2
“To toll” means to stop the running of a time period, especially a time period set by a statute of limitations. Cornell Law
School: Legal Information Institute, Toll,
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/toll#:~:text=To%20toll%20means%20to%20stop,by%20a%20statute%20of%20limitatio
ns%20. (last visited Feb. 11, 2025). JUMP TO SUMMARY ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY
3
FISCAL OR ECONOMIC IMPACT:
STATE GOVERNMENT:
By increasing the sovereign immunity caps, the bill increases the possibility that the state and its agencies will
spend more of their resources to satisfy tort claims. The provision of larger payments in satisfaction of tort claims,
however, may also reduce the demand for other government services that would have otherwise been necessary to
assist claimants.
By reducing the statute of limitations for suits against the government arising in negligence, the bill may reduce the
number of cases initiated and consequently the potential damages sought by claimants from the government.
Further, by reducing the pre-suit time period for a government entity or DFS to review and dispose of a claim
against the state, the bill may affect the pre-suit settlement process.
By increasing the statute of limitations for sexual battery on a victim under 16 to an indefinite period in which an
alleged victim may bring a claim, the bill may increase the number of claims against the government for such
sexual battery.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
The costs resulting from increasing sovereign immunity caps, prohibiting the conditioning of certain insurance
payments on the enactment of a claims bill, and changing a local government’s ability to settle claims without
regard to any statutory limit on damages under s. 768.28, F.S., are indeterminate, but may result in increased
expenditures for local governments related to insurance premiums, settlements, awards, and other legal costs.
PRIVATE SECTOR:
The bill may enable more individuals who have tort claims against the state or one of its agencies or subdivisions
to receive larger payments without the need to pursue a claim bill. The ability to collect larger settlements or
judgments against government entities may also serve as an incentive for private attorneys to represent claimants
in these matters. However, the bill may reduce government services to the public in proportion to additional
amounts required from the budget to satisfy tort claims.
RELEVANT INFORMATION
SUBJECT OVERVIEW:
Civil Tort Action
One of the goals of the civil justice system is to redress tortious conduct, or “torts.” A tort is a wrong for which the
law provides a remedy. Torts are generally divided into two categories, as follows:
An intentional tort, examples of which include an assault, battery, or false imprisonment.
Negligence, which is a tort that is unintentionally committed. To prevail in a negligence lawsuit, the party
seeking the remedy, the “plaintiff,” must demonstrate that the:
o Defendant had a legal duty of care requiring the defendant to conform to a certain standard of
conduct for the protection of others, including the plaintiff, against unreasonable risks;
o Defendant breached his or her duty of care by failing to conform to the required standard;
o Defendant’s breach caused the plaintiff to suffer an injury; and
o Plaintiff suffered actual damage or loss resulting from such injury.
3
Sovereign Immunity
3
6 Florida Practice Series s. 1.1; see Barnett v. Dept. of Fin. Serv., 303 So. 3d 508 (Fla. 2020). JUMP TO SUMMARY ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY
4
Sovereign immunity is a principle under which a government cannot be sued without its consent.
4 Article X, section
13 of the Florida Constitution allows the Legislature to waive this immunity. In accordance with art. X, s. 13 of the
Florida Constitution, Florida law allows for suits in tort against the state and its agencies and subdivisions for
damages resulting from the negligence of government employees acting in the scope of employment.
5 This liability
exists only where a private person would be liable for the same conduct. The waiver of sovereign immunity
provided under section 768.28, F.S., applies only to “injury or loss of property, personal injury, or death caused by
the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the agency or subdivision while acting within the
scope of the employee’s office or employment.”
6
Individual government employees, officers, or agents are immune from suit or liability for damages caused by any
action taken in the scope of employment, unless the damages result from the employee’s acting in bad faith, with
malicious purpose, or in a manner exhibiting wanton and willful disregard for human rights, safety, or property.
7 A
government entity is not liable for any damages resulting from actions by an employee outside the scope of his or
her employment, and is not liable for damages resulting from actions committed by the employee in bad faith, with
malicious purpose, or in a manner exhibiting wanton and willful disregard for human rights, safety, or property.
8
Statutory Caps on Recovery of Damages
Under current law, s. 768.28(5), F.S., caps damages recoverable in a tort action against a governmental entity at
$200,000 per person and $300,000 per incident.
9 Although a court may enter an excess judgment, absent a claim
bill passed by the Legislature, a claimant may not actually collect more than the caps provide.
10
State Agency
A state agency means any department, agency, or instrumentality of a state or of a political subdivision of a state.
Generally, a state agency is a government department, office, or board that operates within a state; state agencies
are responsible for carrying out laws enacted by the state legislature. Some examples of current state agencies
include:
Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA);
Agency for Persons with Disabilities (APD);
Commission on Ethics;
Department of Management Services (DMS);
Department of Military Affairs (DMA);
Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH);
Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University (FAMU);
Florida Atlantic University (FAU);
Florida Citrus;
Florida Commerce (formerly the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity or DEO);
Florida Commission on Human Relations (FCHR);
Florida Commission on Offender Review (Parole Commission);
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS);
Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR);
Florida Department of Children and Families (DCF);
Florida Department of Corrections (DOC);
Florida Department of Education (DOE);
4
Sovereign immunity, Legal Information Institute, https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/sovereign_immunity (last visited Feb. 11,
2025).
5
S. 768.28(1), F.S.
6
City of Pembroke Pines v. Corrections Corp. of America, Inc., 274 So. 3d 1105, 1112 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019) (quoting s. 768.28(1),
F.S.) (internal punctuation omitted).
7
S. 768.28(9)(a), F.S.
8
S. 768.28, F.S.
9
S. 768.28(5), F.S.
10
Breaux v. City of Miami Beach, 899 So. 2d 1059 (Fla. 2005). JUMP TO SUMMARY ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY
5
Florida Department of Elder Affairs;
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP);
Florida Department of Financial Services (DFS);
Florida Department of Health (DOH);
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (DHSMV);
Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ);
Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE);
Florida Department of Legal Affairs (Office of the Attorney General or AOG);
Florida Department of Revenue (DOR);
Florida Department of State (DOS);
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT);
Florida Department of Veterans’ Affairs;
Florida Division of Emergency Management;
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC);
Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU);
Florida Housing Finance Corporation;
Florida International University (FIU);
Florida Lottery;
Florida Office of Financial Regulation (OFR);
Florida Office of Insurance Regulation (FLOIR);
Florida Polytechnic University;
Florida Public Service Commission (PSC);
Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind;
Florida State University (FSU);
New College of Florida;
University of Central Florida (UCF);
University of Florida (UF);
University of North Florida (UNF);
University of South Florida (USF); and
University of West Florida (UWF).
11
Subdivision
A political subdivision is a separate legal entity of the State which usually has specific governmental functions.
12
Section 218.077(2)(f), F.S., defines a political subdivision as a county, municipality, department, commission,
district, board, or other public body, whether corporate or otherwise, created by or under state law. Local
governments are incorporated by special acts of the Florida Legislature and include counties, municipalities, school
districts, and special districts.
13
Legislative Claim Bill
A plaintiff may recover an amount greater than the caps described in s. 768.28(5), F.S., by way of a legislative claim
bill. A claim bill is not an action at law, but rather is a legislative measure that directs the Chief Financial Officer, or
if appropriate, a unit of local government, to pay a specific sum of money to a claimant to satisfy an equitable or
moral obligation.
14 Such obligations typically arise from the negligence of officers or employees of the State or a
local governmental entity.
15 Legislative claim bills are typically pursued after procurement of a judgment or
settlement in an action at law where the full amount of damages awarded cannot be satisfied because of statutory
11
Florida Executive Office of the Governor, Info Center: State Agencies, https://www.flgov.com/eog/info/agencies (last visited
Feb. 11, 2025).
12
Social Security Administration, How to Determine an Entity’s Legal Status,
https://www.ssa.gov/section218training/advanced_course_9.htm#3 (last visited Feb. 11, 2025).
13
Susan A. MacManus, et al, Politics in Florida, (4th ed. 2015).
14
Wagner v. Orange Cty., 960 So. 2d 785, 788 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).
15
Id. JUMP TO SUMMARY ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY
6
caps.
16 The amount awarded is based on the Legislature’s concept of fair treatment of a person who has been
injured or damaged but who is without a complete judicial remedy or who is not otherwise compensable.
17 Unlike
civil judgments, claim bills are not obtainable by right upon the claimant’s proof of his entitlement; rather, they are
granted as a matter of legislative grace.
18
Once a legislative claim bill is formally introduced, a special master
19 usually conducts a quasi-judicial hearing.
20
This hearing may resemble a trial during which the claimant offers testimony as well as documentary and physical
evidence necessary to establish the claim. Trial records may be substituted for witness testimony. Testifying
witnesses are sworn and subject to cross-examination.
21 A respondent may present a defense to contest the claim,
and the special master may then prepare a report with an advisory recommendation to the Legislature if the bill is
placed on an agenda.
22
Alternatively, a government entity may, without the need for a claim bill, settle a claim or pay a judgment against it
for an amount in excess of the caps in s. 768.28, F.S., but only if that amount is within the limits of its insurance
coverage.
23
Accrual of a Claim
An important date for the purpose of a claim bill is the date the claim accrues. Under s. 95.031(1), F.S., a claim
accrues when the last element constituting the cause of action occurs. In a negligence claim, the cause of action
accrues “upon the happening of an accident and the attendant injuries.”
24 Further, s. 768.28(6)(b), F.S., specifies
that the requirements of notice to an agency and denial of the claim required under sovereign immunity are not
deemed to be elements of the cause of action and do not affect the date on which the cause of action accrues.
Statutes of Limitations
A statute of limitations is an absolute bar to the filing of a lawsuit after a date set by law. A statute of limitations
specifies when such time period begins, how long the limitation period runs, and the circumstances by which the
running of the statute may be “tolled,” or suspended. A statute of limitations usually begins to run when a cause of
action accrues, which generally, is when the harm occurs.
Section 95.11(3)(a), F.S., currently provides that general actions against a private citizen or entity founded on
negligence are subject to a two-year statute of limitations.
Contribution
Section 768.31, F.S., provides for the right to contribution. Generally, contribution is a legal action that allows a
tortfeasor to collect from others responsible for the same tort after the tortfeasor has paid more than his or her pro
rata share of the damages. No single tortfeasor is compelled to make contribution beyond his or her own pro rata
share of the entire liability.
25
An action for contribution must be filed within one year after the judgment has become final by lapse of time for
appeal or after appellate review.
26
16
City of Miami v. Valdez, 847 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
17
Wagner, 960 So. 2d at 788 (citing Kahn, Legislative Claim Bills, Fla. B. Journal (April 1988)).
18
United Servs. Auto. Ass’n v. Phillips, 740 So. 2d 1205, 1209 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).
19
The “Special Master” is a role appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Senate President,
respectively. The special master oversees factfinding, which may include holding a de novo hearing on the claim which is
administrative in nature, and may prepare a report and recommendation to the respective chamber. See House Rule 5.6.
20
Wagner, 960 So. 2d at 788 (citing Kahn at 26).
21
Id.
22
Id.
23
S. 768.28(5), F.S.
24
Dep’t. of Transp. v. Soldovere, 519 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 1988).
25
S. 768.31, F.S.
26
S. 768.31(4)(c), F.S. JUMP TO SUMMARY ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY
7
Medical Malpractice
Section 766.102, F.S., provides for the recovery of damages based on the death or personal injury of any person in
which it is alleged the injury resulted from the negligence of a health care provider. In a medical malpractice case,
the claimant has the burden of proving by a greater weight of the evidence that the alleged actions of the provider
represented a breach in the prevailing professional standard of care for that healthcare provider.
27
An action for medical malpractice must be filed within two years from the time the incident giving rise to the action
occurred or within two years from the time the incident is discovered, or should have been discovered with the
exercise of due diligence.
28 However, generally, no medical malpractice action may be filed more than four years
after the date of the incident or occurrence out of which the cause of action accrued.
29
Wrongful Death
Generally, an action for wrongful death may be brought when a person dies due to the wrongful act, negligence,
default, or breach of contract or warranty of any person, and the event would have entitled the person injured to
bring an action and recover damages if the death had not ensued.
30 An action for wrongful death must be initiated
within two years from the death of the subject person.
31
Civil Claim for Sexual Battery
Section 794.011, F.S., establishes the criminal offense of sexual battery. Pursuant to statute, sexual battery means
oral, anal, or female genital penetration, by or union with, the sexual organ of another or the anal or female genital
penetration of another by any other object. The definition of sexual battery, however, does not include an act done
for a bona fide medical purpose. Sexual battery by an adult (18 years of age or older) upon another adult is a first-
degree felony punishable, in general, by imprisonment for up to 30 years and a fine of up to $10,000.
32 The
penalties for sexual battery are increased for victims under the age of 18, vulnerable victims, and habitual
offenders.
Section 95.11, F.S., provides statutes of limitation for various types of civil actions. In 2010, the Legislature
amended s. 95.11, F.S., to remove any statute of limitations applying to a civil action against a private entity for
sexual battery if the victim was under 16 at the time of the crime.
33 The Legislature provided, however, that this
amendment would not resuscitate any civil claims that were already barred by the statute of limitations at the
time.
34
Presuit Procedures
Before a claimant files a lawsuit against a government entity, the claimant generally must present the claim in
writing to the government entity within a time period prescribed by law, which is generally three years.
35 If the
claim is brought against the state, the claimant must also present the claim to the Department of Financial Services
(DFS). The government entity generally then has six months to review the claim. If the government entity does not
dispose of the claim within that six-month period, the claimant may generally proceed with the lawsuit.
36
27
S. 766.102(1), F.S.
28
S. 766.102(1), F.S.
29
S. 95.11(5)(c), F.S.
30
S. 768.19, F.S.
31
S. 95.11(5)(e), F.S.
32
Ss. 775.082, F.S. and 775.083, F.S.
33
Ch. 2010-54, s. 1, Laws of Fla.; s. 95.11(9), F.S.
34
Id. (“This subsection applies to any such action other than one which would have been time barred on or before July 1,
2010”).
35
See s. 768.28(6)(a), F.S.
36
See s. 768.28(6)(d), F.S. JUMP TO SUMMARY ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY
8
OTHER RESOURCES:
Legislative Claim Bill Manual 2024
National Association of Attorneys General: State Sovereign Immunity Nationwide
BILL HISTORY
COMMITTEE REFERENCE ACTION DATE
STAFF
DIRECTOR/
POLICY CHIEF
ANALYSIS
PREPARED BY
Civil Justice & Claims
Subcommittee
17 Y, 1 N 2/19/2025 Jones Mathews
Budget Committee 25 Y, 3 N 3/20/2025 Pridgeon Willson
Judiciary Committee 19 Y, 3 N, As CS 4/8/2025 Kramer Mathews
THE CHANGES ADOPTED BY THE
COMMITTEE:
Amended the sovereign immunity caps for an incident which accrues
after October 1, 2025 to $500,000 per person and $1,000,000 per
incident.
Amended the sovereign immunity caps for an incident which accrues
after October 1, 2030 to $600,000 per person and $1,100,000 per
incident.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THIS BILL ANALYSIS HAS BEEN UPDATED TO INCORPORATE ALL OF THE CHANGES DESCRIBED ABOVE.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------