Florida 2025 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H0577

Introduced
2/12/25  
Refer
2/19/25  
Refer
2/19/25  
Refer
2/19/25  
Refer
3/21/25  
Refer
3/21/25  
Refer
4/3/25  
Refer
4/17/25  
Engrossed
4/23/25  

Caption

Removal, Storage, and Cleanup of Electric Vehicles

Impact

The bill's implementation will have substantial effects on how local authorities manage the towing and storage of electric vehicles. By defining 'proper storage' in terms of safety measures, it mandates that electric vehicles are kept a safe distance from combustibles and structures, potentially changing current operational protocols for towing services. This regulation addresses concerns raised by various stakeholders regarding the safe handling of damaged electric vehicles, aligning local practices with a more standardized state framework.

Summary

House Bill 0577, titled 'Removal, Storage, and Cleanup of Electric Vehicles', aims to establish regulations concerning the administration fees for towing and storing electric vehicles involved in accidents. Specifically, it requires counties and municipalities to establish a daily administration fee for the proper storage of electric vehicles, which can be up to three times the current standard amount set for other vehicles. This move seeks to ensure the safe management of electric vehicles due to their unique properties and the potential risks they present when damaged.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 0577 appears largely supportive among proponents who view the regulation as necessary for public safety and vehicle management. Advocates for electric vehicle safety argue that these measures are crucial in preventing fire hazards and ensuring that special considerations for electric vehicles are in place. However, some critics express concerns regarding the additional fees that could burden vehicle owners during an already stressful situation following an accident, highlighting the balance that needs to be struck between safety and affordability.

Contention

Notable points of contention within the discussions surrounding HB 0577 focus on the implications of establishing these fees. Critics raise concerns about the financial impact on vehicle owners, particularly those who may not be able to afford increased towing and storage fees in the event of an accident. Additionally, opponents argue about the potential for uneven implementation across different jurisdictions, leading to confusion and inequity in how electric vehicle accidents are managed. This reflects a broader debate on local control versus state regulation, particularly in how municipal authorities are affected by new statewide mandates.

Companion Bills

FL S0872

Similar To Price Controls for the Storage of Electric Vehicles

Similar Bills

CA SB1507

Taxpayers’ Rights Advocate: release or return of levy.

CA SB1290

Sidewalk vendors.

CA AB2038

School finance: administrative employees to teacher ratio.

CA AB1136

Property Assessed Clean Energy program: enforcement: ancillary relief.

US SB5649

Save Our Seas 2.0 Amendments Act

CA SB679

Political Reform Act of 1974: postgovernment employment.

US SB890

Screening Partnership Reform Act

CA SB1436

Political Reform Act of 1974: postgovernment employment.