Florida 2025 2025 Regular Session

Florida Senate Bill S1400 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 03/31/2025

                    The Florida Senate 
BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT 
(This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.) 
Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Criminal Justice  
 
BILL: CS/SB 1400 
INTRODUCER:  Commerce and Tourism Committee and Senator Calatayud 
SUBJECT:  Removal of Altered Sexual Depictions Posted Without Consent 
DATE: March 31, 2025 
 
 ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR  REFERENCE  	ACTION 
1. Dike McKay CM Fav/CS 
2. Parker Stokes CJ Pre-meeting 
3.     RC  
 
Please see Section IX. for Additional Information: 
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE - Substantial Changes 
 
I. Summary: 
CS/SB 1400 amends s. 836.13, F.S., to require covered platforms, such as websites and online 
services, to remove altered sexual depictions and copies of such from their platform upon request 
of the victim. Upon receipt of the request, a covered platform has 48 hours to remove the altered 
sexual depiction. The bill requires covered platforms to provide clear notice of the platform’s 
responsibilities under the bill, including the manner in which a person can submit a notification 
and request for removal of the altered sexual depiction. The bill identifies which platforms are 
bound by these requirements and provides liability protections for platforms’ good faith efforts 
to remove altered sexual depictions. Further, the bill provides a remedy for violations, classifying 
a failure to follow these requirements as an unfair or deceptive act or practice under the Florida 
Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. 
 
The bill takes effect upon becoming law. 
REVISED:   BILL: CS/SB 1400   	Page 2 
 
II. Present Situation: 
Nonconsensual Altered Sexual Depictions  
Over the last decade, Americans have started to recognize the growing problem of distribution of 
sexually explicit images without consent, otherwise known as “revenge porn.”
1
 Although Florida 
and other states have enacted protections against revenge porn, there are still instances in which a 
person may be a victim of nonconsensual pornography in the form of altered sexual depictions, 
more commonly known as “deepfakes.”
2
 Deepfakes typically take the form of imagery, video, 
and audio material that “is produced or distributed without the consent of the subject and has 
been altered, potentially with artificial intelligence, to show nonconsensual intimate or explicit 
content.”
3
Advancements in technology, such as increased availability and usage of generative 
AI, have enabled perpetrators to manipulate sexual materials in ways that circumvent revenge 
porn laws.
4
 For example, “if a photo depicted the victim nude, where the victim’s face was real, 
but the victim’s genitals were computer generated, many laws would not apply because the 
intimate part of the image was not the victim’s.”
5
 
 
Researchers have discovered that 98% of the deepfake videos found online are explicitly 
pornographic and 99% of deepfake pornography features women.
6
 Moreover, the creation of 
deepfake pornography is rapidly increasing, as researchers found that there were 464% more 
deepfake pornographic videos created in 2023 than in 2022.
7
 Further, 90% of deepfake 
pornography is found on dedicated deepfake pornography platforms.
8
 In response to the 
prevalence of deepfakes, the Department of Homeland Security has declared that “[d]eepfakes 
and the misuse of synthetic content pose a clear, present, and evolving threat to the public across 
national security, law enforcement, financial, and societal domains.”
9
 
 
1
 “In 2016, 10 million people, or 2% of Americans had reported being victims of nonconsensual porn. Individuals ages 18-29 
generally, and women aged 18-29 specifically, as well as LGTBQ+ Americans were victimized at even higher rates. In 2017, 
the number of young Americans ages 18-29 who had become victims of nonconsensual porn jumped to 12%, an increase of 
over 100%. In 2019, a larger study suggests that the problem has only grown, showing a 400% increase in the number of 
victims from 2016.  Taken as a whole, these statistics show the number of victims continues to rise at an alarming rate even 
though both the legal system and society as a whole have attempted to address the issue.” Chance Carter, NAT’L ASS’N OF 
ATT’Y GEN., An Update on the Legal Landscape of Revenge Porn, available at https://www.naag.org/attorney-general-
journal/an-update-on-the-legal-landscape-of-revenge-porn/#identifier_4_21493 (last visited March 28, 2025). 
2
 RAINN, RAINN’s Recommendation for Effectively Addressing Nonconsensual Manipulated Intimate Material (Deepfakes), 
available at 
https://www.rainn.org/sites/default/files/import/RAINN%20on%20nonconsensual%20manipulated%20intimate%20material
%20-
%20Google%20Docs.pdf#:~:text=We%20refer%20to%20imagery%2C%20video%2C%20audio%2C%20etc.%20that,or%20
explicit%20content%20as%20%E2%80%9Cnonconsensual%20manipulated%20intimate%20material%E2%80%9D (last 
visited Mar. 17, 2025).; see also DEPT. OF HOMELAND SEC., Increasing Threat of Deepfake Identities, 
https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/increasing_threats_of_deepfake_identities_0.pdf (last visited March 28, 
2025). 
3
 RAINN, supra note 2. 
4
 RAINN, supra note 2. 
5
 RAINN, supra note 2. 
6
 Security Hero, 2023 State of Deepfakes, available at https://www.securityhero.io/state-of-deepfakes/#concluding-remarks 
(last visited March 28, 2025). 
7
 Id. 
8
 Id. 
9
 DEPT. OF HOMELAND SEC., supra note 2.  BILL: CS/SB 1400   	Page 3 
 
 
Altered Sexual Depictions under Florida Law  
In 2022, the Florida Legislature created s. 836.13, F.S., to cover the gap in law in the law 
between revenge porn and nonconsensual altered sexual depictions. Nonconsensual altered 
sexual depictions are distinguishable from consensual pornography as the person being depicted 
has not given his or her consent and did not actually engage in the sexual behavior he or she is 
depicted as doing. Such depictions may exploit the depicted person for other’s gratification and 
may cause emotional and reputational harm stemming from subsequent uses of the depiction and 
society’s response to the person depicted.
10
 
 
Section 836.13, F.S., defines “Altered sexual depiction” to mean any visual depiction that, as a 
result of any type of digital, electronic, mechanical, or other modification, alteration, or 
adaptation, depicts a realistic version of an identifiable person:
11
 
• With the nude body parts of another person as the nude body parts of the identifiable person; 
• With computer-generated nude body parts as the nude body parts of the identifiable person; 
or 
• Engaging in sexual conduct as defined in s. 847.001, F.S.,
12
 in which the identifiable person 
did not engage. 
 
A person who willfully and maliciously promotes any altered sexual depiction of an identifiable 
person, without the consent of the identifiable person, and who knows or reasonably should have 
known that such visual depiction was an altered sexual depiction, commits a third degree 
felony.
13
 
 
The presence of a disclaimer within an altered sexual depiction which notifies a viewer that the 
person or persons depicted did not consent to or participate in the creation or promotion of the 
material, or that the person or persons depicted did not actually perform the actions portrayed, is 
not a defense and does not relieve a person of criminal liability under this section.
14
 
 
A person who is portrayed in such an altered sexual depiction without his or her consent may 
initiate a civil cause of action against a person who willfully and maliciously promoted such 
depiction and may obtain appropriate relief to prevent or remedy the promotion, including: 
 
10
 Mathew B. Kugler and Carly Pace, Deepfake Privacy: Attitudes and Regulation, Northwestern University Law Review, 
2021 Vol 116:611, p. 624-25, 
https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1476&context=nulr (last visited March 19, 
2025). 
11
 Section 836.13(1)(b), F.S., defines “Identifiable person” to mean a person who is recognizable as an actual person by the 
person’s face, likeness, or other distinguishing characteristic, such as a unique birthmark, or other recognizable feature. 
12
 Section 847.001(19), F.S., defines “Sexual conduct” to mean actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual 
intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, or sadomasochistic abuse; actual or simulated lewd exhibition of the genitals; 
actual physical contact with a person’s clothed or unclothed genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or, if such person is a female, 
breast with the intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of either party; or any act or conduct which constitutes sexual 
battery or simulates that sexual battery is being or will be committed. A mother’s breastfeeding of her baby does not under 
any circumstance constitute “sexual conduct.”  
13
 A third degree felony is punishable by a term of imprisonment up to 5 years and a $5,000 fine as provided in ss. 775.082, 
775.083, and 775.084, F.S. 
14
 Section 836.13(4), F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1400   	Page 4 
 
• Injunctive relief. 
• Monetary damages to include $10,000 or actual damages incurred. 
• Reasonable attorney fees and costs.
15
 
 
Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act  
It is unlawful under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA), 
ss. 501.201-501.213, F.S., for a party to take part in “unfair methods of competition, 
unconscionable acts or practices, and unfair or deceptive acts of practices in the conduct of any 
trade or commerce.”
16
 Such practices include fraudulent billing,
17
 misleading a consumer or 
misrepresenting a product’s characteristics,
18
 or other behavior determined to be unfair by a 
court.
19
 Under the FDUTPA, the Office of the State Attorney or Department of Legal Affairs, 
either by their own inquiry or through complaints, may investigate violations of the FDUTPA.
20
 
In addition to other remedies under state and federal law, the enforcing authority may bring 
actions for declaratory judgment, injunctive relief, actual damages on behalf of consumers and 
businesses, cease and desist orders, and civil penalties up to $10,000 per violation.
21
 Moreover, 
consumers may bring private actions against parties for violating the FDUTPA, resulting in 
either: 
• Declaratory judgment and injunctive relief when the consumer is aggrieved by a FDUTPA 
violation; or 
• Actual damages, attorney fees, and court costs, when the consumer has suffered a loss due to 
the FDUTPA violation.
22
 
III. Effect of Proposed Changes: 
Required Removal Procedure  
CS/SB 1400 requires that no later than December 31, 2025, covered platforms establish a process 
by which a person may notify and request removal of an altered sexual depiction
23
 that was 
published without their consent. The notification and request for removal must include, in 
writing: 
• A physical or electronic signature of the identifiable person or an authorized person acting on 
their behalf. 
 
15
 Section 836.13(5), F.S. 
16
 Section 501.204, F.S. 
17
 State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Medical Service Center of Florida, Inc., 103 F. Supp. 3d 1343 (S.D. Fla. 2015). 
18
 Lewis v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, 530 F. Supp. 3d 1183 (S.D. Fla. 2021); Marty v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, LLC, 43 
F. Supp. 3d 1333 (S.D. Fla. 2014). 
19
 See Siever v. BWGaskets, Inc., 669 F. Supp. 2d 1286, 1292-93 (M.D. Fla. 2009). 
20
 The enforcing authority under the FDUTPA may “administer oaths and affirmations, subpoena witnesses or matter, and 
collect evidence.” Section 501.206, F.S. 
21
 Sections 501.207, 501.2077, 501.2075, 501.208, F.S. 
22
 Sections 501.2105, 501.211, F.S. 
23
 “Altered sexual depiction” means any visual depiction that, as a result of any type of digital, electronic, mechanical, or 
other modification, alteration, or adaptation, depicts a realistic version of an identifiable person: 1. With the nude body parts 
of another person as the nude body parts of the identifiable person; 2. With computer-generated nude body parts as the nude 
body parts of the identifiable person; or 3. Engaging in sexual conduct as defined in s. 847.001, F.S., in which the identifiable 
person did not engage. Section 836.13, F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1400   	Page 5 
 
• An identification of, and information reasonably sufficient for the covered platform to locate, 
the altered sexual depiction of the identifiable person.  
• A brief statement that the identifiable person has a good faith belief that any altered sexual 
depiction identified is not consensual, including any relevant information for the covered 
platform to determine the depiction was published without consent. 
• Information sufficient to enable the covered platform to contact the person. 
 
Upon receipt of a valid removal request, within 48 hours the covered platform must remove the 
altered sexual depiction and make reasonable efforts to identify and remove any known, identical 
copies of such depiction. 
 
Clear and Conspicuous Notice 
The bill requires a covered platform to provide clear and conspicuous notice of the notice and 
removal process, which: 
• Is easy to read and is in plain language. 
• Provides information regarding the responsibilities of the covered platform under this bill. 
• Includes a description of how a person can submit a notification and request for removal. 
 
Covered Platforms  
Under the bill, “covered platform” means a website, online service, online application, or mobile 
application that serves the public and:  
• Primarily provides a forum for user-generated content, including messages, videos, images, 
games, and audio files; or  
• For which it is in the regular course of trade or business of the website, online service, online 
application, or mobile application to publish, curate, host, or make available content of 
nonconsensual altered sexual depictions. 
 
The bill explicitly does not apply to: 
• A provider of information service or telecommunications service, as defined in 47 U.S.C. s. 
153, for content provided by another person.  
• Electronic mail. 
• Except as otherwise provided, an online service, application, or website: 
o That consists primarily of preselected content by the provider, rather than content that is 
user generated; and  
o For which any chat, comment, or interactive functionality is incidental to, directly related 
to, or dependent on the provision of the content described above. 
 
Liability  
The bill provides that a covered platform shall not be found liable for any claim based on the 
platform’s good faith removal of material claimed to be a nonconsensual altered sexual 
depiction, regardless of whether the altered sexual depiction is ultimately found to be unlawful. 
  BILL: CS/SB 1400   	Page 6 
 
Remedies  
In addition to the remedies provided in s. 836.13(5), F.S., a failure to comply with the notice and 
removal requirements of the bill constitutes an unfair or deceptive act or practice under the 
FDUTPA. 
 
Effective Date  
The bill takes effect upon becoming law. 
IV. Constitutional Issues: 
A. Municipality/County Mandates Restrictions: 
None. 
B. Public Records/Open Meetings Issues: 
None. 
C. Trust Funds Restrictions: 
None. 
D. State Tax or Fee Increases: 
None. 
E. Other Constitutional Issues: 
None identified. 
V. Fiscal Impact Statement: 
A. Tax/Fee Issues: 
None. 
B. Private Sector Impact: 
Covered platforms will need to comply with the notification and removal requirements in 
the bill. 
C. Government Sector Impact: 
None. 
VI. Technical Deficiencies: 
None.  BILL: CS/SB 1400   	Page 7 
 
VII. Related Issues: 
None. 
VIII. Statutes Affected: 
This bill substantially amends section 836.13 of the Florida Statutes. 
IX. Additional Information: 
A. Committee Substitute – Statement of Changes: 
(Summarizing differences between the Committee Substitute and the prior version of the bill.) 
CS by Commerce and Tourism Committee on March 17, 2024: 
The committee substitute excludes providers of information service or 
telecommunications service, for content provided by another person, from the covered 
platforms under this bill. 
B. Amendments: 
None. 
This Senate Bill Analysis does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill’s introducer or the Florida Senate.