Uniform Civil Forfeiture Procedure Act; certain property is exempt from seizure; provide
Impact
The amendments introduced by HB109 are designed to provide greater protection for personal property, particularly for vulnerable populations who might otherwise be adversely affected by aggressive forfeiture practices. By defining specific property types that cannot be seized, the bill aims to prevent undue hardship on individuals or families who are already facing economic challenges. This legislative change signals a shift towards a more protective stance regarding personal property in the state of Georgia.
Summary
House Bill 109 proposes amendments to the Uniform Civil Forfeiture Procedure Act, specifically to exclude certain types of property from being subject to seizure or forfeiture. Notably, the bill stipulates that real property with an active homestead exemption, currency amounting to $541 or less, and motor vehicles valued under $5,000 are exempt from forfeiture. The intention behind this bill is to safeguard individuals' property rights, particularly for those with limited means or in specific financial situations.
Contention
While supporters of the bill argue that it is a necessary reform to protect the rights of citizens from excessive government seizure, there may be concerns voiced by law enforcement or prosecutorial entities regarding the potential limitations this could place on their ability to effectively tackle crime related to asset forfeiture. Critics may also challenge whether the specific thresholds set in the bill, such as the amounts for currency and vehicle valuation, are adequate to prevent exploitation while still allowing law enforcement to operate effectively.
Relating to civil asset forfeiture proceedings, to the seizure and forfeiture of certain property, and to the reporting and disposition of proceeds and property from civil asset forfeiture.