Georgia 2023-2024 Regular Session

Georgia House Bill HB11

Introduced
1/9/23  
Report Pass
1/26/23  
Introduced
1/9/23  
Report Pass
1/26/23  
Refer
1/30/23  
Engrossed
1/26/23  
Report Pass
2/15/23  
Refer
1/30/23  
Enrolled
3/30/23  
Report Pass
2/15/23  
Chaptered
5/1/23  
Enrolled
3/30/23  
Chaptered
5/1/23  

Caption

Mitchell County; Board of Education; modify compensation of members

Impact

The enactment of HB11 will directly affect the budget and financial allocations for the Mitchell County Board of Education. The adjustment in compensation may enable the board to attract and retain dedicated individuals for these roles, potentially leading to better governance and oversight of educational policies. Moreover, by establishing defined compensation, HB11 could contribute to more transparent financial practices within the local education authority.

Summary

House Bill 11 (HB11) proposes modifications to the compensation structure for the chairperson and members of the Board of Education of Mitchell County. Specifically, the bill sets the monthly compensation for the chairperson at $450 and for each board member at $400. Additionally, it includes provisions for a per diem of $50 for board members while engaging in official meetings or business activities beyond the county limits. The bill aims to clarify and adjust compensation in a manner that reflects current financial considerations faced by local education boards.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB11 appears to be largely positive within the local governance context. Supporters view the bill as a necessary update that acknowledges the responsibilities of board members and the need for fair compensation. However, there may also be concerns about increasing expenses in educational budgets, particularly regarding the funding of programs and resources critical to student success.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB11 could include debates on the adequacy of the proposed compensation levels and their implications on the local government's budget. While the proposed increases aim to support board members, some stakeholders might argue that fiscal prudence should prevail, particularly in light of existing funding challenges in education. Additionally, discussions might address how this bill aligns with broader educational funding legislation and budget priorities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.