Georgia House Bill HB1340

Georgia 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/20/24
• Report Pass: 2/27/24

Caption

Professions and businesses; credentialing of qualified behavior analysts and qualified autism services practitioner-supervisors; provide

Impact

The introduction of HB 1340 is likely to have far-reaching consequences for the practice of applied behavior analysis in Georgia. By revising the licensing requirements and establishing a governance board to oversee the certification of practitioners, the bill could improve the quality of services provided to individuals with autism spectrum disorders and related disabilities. It also aims to ensure that practitioners maintain current and relevant educational qualifications, thus promoting ethical practices in the field. Such regulatory changes could potentially make it easier for clients to identify qualified professionals, enhancing access to needed services.

Summary

House Bill 1340 aims to amend Chapter 7A of Title 43 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, which pertains to the practice of applied behavior analysis. The bill seeks to enhance the credentialing process for qualified behavior analysts and qualified autism service practitioner-supervisors, thereby establishing a more structured approach to licensure within the field. One of its significant contributions includes setting forth specific definitions and qualifications for these professionals, essentially aiming to elevate the standards and professionalism within the field of behavior analysis and autism services.

Contention

While the bill has drawn support for its emphasis on stricter credentialing and supervision, there may be concerns from practitioners regarding the implications of added regulatory steps. Some advocates argue that increased licensure requirements could result in reduced workforce flexibility, particularly among those who wish to practice in the state temporarily. Moreover, the creation and composition of the Georgia Behavior Analyst Licensing Board might serve as a point of contention, as discussions may arise regarding the chosen members' qualifications and the balance between licensed professionals and public representatives on the board.