Georgia 2023-2024 Regular Session

Georgia House Bill HB1501

Introduced
3/18/24  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Introduced
3/18/24  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Refer
3/26/24  
Engrossed
3/21/24  
Refer
3/26/24  
Enrolled
4/2/24  
Report Pass
3/26/24  
Chaptered
5/6/24  
Enrolled
4/2/24  
Chaptered
5/6/24  

Caption

City of Roswell Public Facilities Authority Act; enact

Impact

By creating the City of Roswell Public Facilities Authority, the bill facilitates the financing and construction of public projects without placing debts on taxpayers. The authority has the power to issue revenue bonds that are backed solely by specific revenue streams rather than by the general credit of the state or city. This structure seeks to minimize taxpayer burden while still enabling needed infrastructure improvements, enhancing facilities such as parks, emergency services, recreational, and healthcare facilities.

Summary

House Bill 1501, titled the 'City of Roswell Public Facilities Authority Act,' establishes a public corporation known as the City of Roswell Public Facilities Authority. This authority is designed to enhance the public good and welfare of Roswell's inhabitants by providing and managing essential facilities, equipment, and services efficiently. The bill outlines the powers of the authority to issue revenue bonds, conduct financial activities, and manage public properties as needed to serve the citizens of Roswell more effectively.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 1501 appears to be positive, particularly from local governance and development advocates who see it as a necessary step for local government efficiency and financial management. Proponents argue that the establishment of this authority empowers local officials to better respond to community needs through self-funded projects, thereby reducing dependency on state or federal finances. However, potential concerns raised include the oversight of this authority and the implications of its revenue-generating capabilities, which could lead to increased fees or charges for public services.

Contention

One point of contention within discussions about the bill involves concerns over checks and balances for the authority's powers. While it provides significant latitude to manage local funds and projects, critics might argue about the lack of strict oversight and the potential for mismanagement of the funds generated by the revenue bonds. Balancing the need for efficient local governance with the accountability and transparency of such authorities remains a key consideration, ensuring that the intended public benefits are realized without compromising taxpayer interests.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

GA HB750

City of Watkinsville Public Facilities Authority Act; enact

GA HB536

Public Facilities Authority of the City of Fairburn Act; enact

GA SB575

Milledgeville Public Facilities Authority; create

GA HB781

Henry County Building and Facilities Authority Act; enact

GA HB519

Emanuel County Public Facilities Authority Act; enact

GA HB780

Brooks County Public Facilities Authority Act; enact

GA SB78

"City of Tybee Island Buildings and Public Facilities Authority Act"; enact

GA HB356

City of Doraville Building and Public Facilities Authority Act; enact