Georgia 2023-2024 Regular Session

Georgia House Bill HB203

Introduced
2/1/23  
Report Pass
2/14/23  
Introduced
2/1/23  
Engrossed
2/22/23  
Report Pass
2/14/23  
Refer
2/23/23  
Engrossed
2/22/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Refer
2/23/23  
Enrolled
3/30/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Chaptered
5/2/23  
Enrolled
3/30/23  
Chaptered
5/2/23  

Caption

Health; restrictions on sale and dispensing of contact lenses with respect to physicians; revise provisions

Impact

If passed, the bill would enforce stricter controls on the dispensing of contact lenses, requiring that only licensed individuals be authorized to write prescriptions. This would foster a more uniform standard of care across the state, ensuring that patients undergo appropriate evaluations prior to being prescribed corrective lenses. Moreover, it would align state laws with telehealth advancements, allowing eye assessments to be carried out remotely while still enforcing rigorous safety and compliance measures.

Summary

House Bill 203 aims to amend the existing regulations surrounding the sale and dispensing of contact lenses and spectacles in Georgia. The bill revises definitions and establishes requirements for the use of assessment mechanisms, which can include automated or virtual devices for eye assessments. It ensures that prescriptions cannot be written without prior eye examinations or assessments and sets forth various obligations for providers. The intent is to safeguard patient welfare while incorporating modern technologies like telehealth into ocular assessments.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 203 appears to be generally supportive among healthcare professionals, such as optometrists, who view these measures as a way to enhance patient safety and care standards. However, there could be concerns from some stakeholders regarding the increased regulatory burden that these requirements might impose on their practices. The emphasis on proper assessments is perceived positively, yet there may be pushback from entities affected by these tightening regulations.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between advancing telehealth services and maintaining the traditional in-person examination standard. While proponents advocate for the integration of technology into eye assessments to improve accessibility and convenience for patients, opponents may argue that this could compromise the thoroughness of ocular health evaluations. Additionally, the bill includes penalties for violations, which some stakeholders might see as overly punitive, highlighting the tension between ensuring compliance and allowing flexibility in practice.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MI SB0365

Health: occupations; examination and evaluation for purchase of contact lenses; allow to be in person or by telemedicine. Amends secs. 5553, 5555, 5557 & 5561 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.5553 et seq.) & adds secs. 5560 & 5562.

MI HB4558

Health: occupations; examination and evaluation for purchase of contact lenses; allow to be in person or by telemedicine. Amends secs. 5553, 5555, 5557 & 5561 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.5553 et seq.) & adds secs. 5560 & 5562.

WV HB4601

Relating to expiration date of an optometrist’s prescription

WV SB295

Extending time that prescription for spectacles remains valid

WV SB216

Extending time that prescription for spectacles remains valid

CA SB776

Optometry.

NH HB1139

Relative to ophthalmic prescription requirements.

WV HB2994

Relating to expired date of an optometrist’s prescription