Georgia 2023-2024 Regular Session

Georgia House Bill HB350

Introduced
2/9/23  
Report Pass
2/16/23  
Introduced
2/9/23  
Report Pass
2/16/23  
Refer
2/21/23  
Engrossed
2/16/23  
Report Pass
3/27/23  
Refer
2/21/23  
Enrolled
3/31/23  
Report Pass
3/27/23  
Chaptered
5/1/23  
Enrolled
3/31/23  
Chaptered
5/1/23  

Caption

Butts County; Magistrate Court; authorize assessment and collection of technology fee

Impact

The successful implementation of HB350 is expected to have a positive impact on the efficiency and modernization of the Magistrate Court in Butts County. By allowing the court to generate its own revenue for technology enhancements, the bill supports better public access to court records and promotes an overall improvement in court service delivery. The establishment of a segregated account for these funds ensures that they are utilized exclusively for designated technological needs, thus reinforcing accountability in the management of court resources.

Summary

House Bill 350 is legislation aimed at allowing the Magistrate Court of Butts County to impose a technology fee for civil actions and court fines. The bill specifies that the fee cannot exceed five dollars for each filing and each fine. The funds generated from this fee will be strictly used for enhancing the technological capabilities of the court, including investments in computer hardware and software as well as maintenance and installation of audio-visual and other technological equipment necessary for court operations.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB350 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among local lawmakers who recognize the need for upgraded technology in the judiciary. The bill’s passage through the legislative process, with a unanimous vote in favor in the Senate, reflects a broad consensus on the importance of enhancing court infrastructure to meet modern demands. However, there may be some concerns regarding the potential financial burdens on individuals filing cases and fines, which would need to be monitored post-implementation.

Contention

While the bill has gained approval without opposition, discussions may arise regarding the long-term sustainability of the fee after its termination date of July 1, 2033, or how residual funds will be allocated beyond that point. Additionally, some stakeholders might question whether relying on fees for technology funds could create disparities in access to justice, particularly among lower-income residents who may be disproportionately affected by filing fees. Monitoring these issues will be crucial to ensuring that the enhancements supported by the technology fee benefit all segments of the community fairly.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.