Georgia 2023-2024 Regular Session

Georgia House Bill HB475

Introduced
2/16/23  
Report Pass
2/23/23  
Introduced
2/16/23  
Engrossed
2/28/23  
Report Pass
2/23/23  
Refer
3/1/23  
Engrossed
2/28/23  
Report Pass
3/21/23  
Refer
3/1/23  
Enrolled
3/30/23  
Report Pass
3/21/23  
Chaptered
5/5/23  
Enrolled
3/30/23  
Chaptered
5/5/23  

Caption

Code Revision Commission; revise, modernize and correct errors in omissions

Impact

The passage of HB 475 is expected to streamline the legislative text by updating terminology, correcting inaccuracies, and eliminating redundant or outdated sections of the law. By doing so, it enhances the legal framework within which Georgia's governance operates, ensuring that the state's laws reflect current practices and standards. This act supports a more efficient legal environment, potentially reducing confusion and misinterpretations in legal proceedings.

Summary

House Bill 475 aims to amend various sections of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated by implementing revisions, modernizations, and corrections to errors or omissions. This act is part of the ongoing efforts by the Code Revision Commission to maintain the accuracy and relevance of statutory law in Georgia. The bill entails the repeal of obsolete portions of the Code, aligns the statutes with contemporary practices, and codifies principles from state Supreme Court decisions for improved clarity and legality in application.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around the bill appears to be positive, marked by a strong endorsement from various stakeholders who recognize the need for a modernized and accurate legal code. Proponents emphasize that such revisions are crucial for maintaining the rule of law and ensuring that citizens and lawmakers can easily navigate the statutes. Legislative discussions likely centered on the necessity of these updates, with minimal opposition noted in the voting history, indicating a consensus on the importance of the bill's objectives.

Contention

While overall support is evident, the discussion may include concerns about maintaining sufficient public input during the code revision process. Critics could argue that without careful scrutiny, important nuances might be overlooked, particularly in areas where the law impacts citizens directly. Furthermore, ensuring that repealed elements do not inadvertently create legal gaps may be an area of concern for some legislators.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA ACA1

Public finance.

CA ACA19

State finance: budget: unemployment insurance debt repayment.

WY HB0070

Local government distributions.

US HB1832

Special Immigrant Visas for Afghan Fulbright Scholars Act of 2023

WY SF0060

Sales tax distribution rates.

WY HB0042

Local government distributions.

CA SB1507

Taxpayers’ Rights Advocate: release or return of levy.

CA SB957

Vehicles: high-occupancy vehicle lanes.