Georgia 2023-2024 Regular Session

Georgia House Bill HB645

Introduced
3/1/23  
Report Pass
3/9/23  
Introduced
3/1/23  
Report Pass
3/9/23  
Refer
3/13/23  
Engrossed
3/9/23  
Report Pass
3/16/23  
Refer
3/13/23  
Enrolled
3/30/23  
Report Pass
3/16/23  
Chaptered
5/3/23  
Enrolled
3/30/23  
Chaptered
5/3/23  

Caption

Sylvester, City of; municipal court; levy and collect a technology fee

Impact

If passed, HB 645 would impact local government regulations by allowing the City of Sylvester to implement a specific fee designed to support technology enhancements in its court system. This could lead to improved efficiency and productivity in court operations, with potential positive effects on case processing times and public accessibility to court services. The bill reflects a growing trend among municipal governments to adopt technology in order to better serve their constituents and adapt to contemporary judicial demands.

Summary

House Bill 645 concerns the City of Sylvester and authorizes its municipal court to levy and collect a technology fee. The intent of the bill is to enhance the operational capabilities of the municipal court by providing necessary funding that can be utilized for technological advancements. This could include improvements in court record-keeping, case management systems, and other technology needs that facilitate better service delivery to the public.

Sentiment

The discussion around HB 645 appeared favorable among the local stakeholders who recognize the importance of integrating technology within the municipal court system. Supporters argue that this fee system is a necessary step for better functioning courts, while critics may raise concerns regarding the additional costs imposed on residents, particularly in economic conditions where many may be struggling financially. Overall, the sentiment tends to lean toward recognizing the necessity of modernization in local government services.

Contention

Notable points of contention around HB 645 center on the financial implications of such a fee. Opponents may voice concerns about the burden placed on individuals who interact with the municipal court, raising questions about equitable access to justice and how these fees might disproportionately affect low-income residents. The debate likely revolves around balancing the need for technological advancement with the obligations municipalities have to ensure fair and accessible public services.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

GA HB1230

Edison, City of; municipal court to collect a technology fee; authorize

GA HB1189

Barwick, City of; municipal court to collect a technology fee; authorize

GA HB1469

Emerson, City of; Municipal Court; charge technology fee

GA HB591

Cleveland, City of; Municipal Court; charge a technology fee

GA HB1106

Tybee Island, City of; Municipal Court; charge technology fee

GA HB174

Centerville, City of; Municipal Court; charge a technology fee

GA HB272

Carrollton, City of; Municipal Court; charge technology fee

GA HB39

Habersham County; Magistrate Court; authorize assessment and collection of technology fee

GA HB701

Terrell County; Probate Court; authorize assessment and collection of a technology fee

GA HB1479

Ware County; Probate Court; authorize assessment and collection of technology fee

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.