Georgia 2023-2024 Regular Session

Georgia House Bill HB85

Introduced
1/26/23  
Report Pass
2/9/23  
Introduced
1/26/23  
Engrossed
2/15/23  
Report Pass
2/9/23  
Refer
2/16/23  
Engrossed
2/15/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Refer
2/16/23  
Enrolled
3/30/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Chaptered
5/2/23  
Enrolled
3/30/23  
Chaptered
5/2/23  

Caption

Insurance; require health benefit policy coverage for biomarker testing if supported by medical and scientific evidence

Impact

If enacted, HB 85 would affect existing provisions of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated related to insurance and medical assistance. The bill specifically mandates that all health benefit policies renewed or issued on or after July 1, 2023, must cover biomarker testing, hence potentially expanding access for patients who rely on these tests for managing their health conditions. Additionally, the legislation includes stipulations for how prior authorizations must be handled, ensuring that patients receive timely decisions regarding their care.

Summary

House Bill 85 aims to enhance healthcare coverage in Georgia by mandating that health benefit policies include coverage for biomarker testing, provided such testing is supported by medical and scientific evidence. This legislation emphasizes the significance of biomarker testing in diagnosing, treating, and managing various diseases. By requiring insurers to recognize and cover biomarker testing, the bill seeks to streamline access to cutting-edge medical technology and promote more personalized healthcare approaches for patients.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 85 appears to be positive among advocates of advanced medical testing and patient care, who view the bill as a significant step towards improving healthcare access. Stakeholders, including medical professionals and patient advocacy groups, have expressed support for the bill's provisions, emphasizing its potential to enhance treatment options. Conversely, some critics may raise concerns about the implications for insurance costs and the regulatory burden on insurers, but specific objections were not prominently featured in the discussions available.

Contention

Notable points of contention might center on the practical aspects of implementing the mandates outlined in the bill, particularly how insurers will adapt their policies to meet the new requirements. Concerns could arise regarding the balance between expanding access to biomarker testing and ensuring the sustainability of insurance plans. Additionally, the processes for appeals and exceptions to adverse determinations could also be scrutinized, particularly regarding how effectively these processes are communicated to beneficiaries.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1170

Political Reform Act of 1974: filing requirements.

CA AB2051

Candidate’s statement.

CA AB2679

Fictitious business names: statements: publication.

CA AB515

Trial: statement of decision.

CA SB632

Vehicles: off-highway recreation: Red Rock Canyon State Park.

TX HB5377

Relating to the filing of a fraudulent financing statement in relation to certain secured transactions; authorizing the imposition of a fee.

TX SB2221

Relating to the filing of a fraudulent financing statement in relation to certain secured transactions; authorizing the imposition of a fee.

CA AB750

Crimes: perjury.