Georgia 2023-2024 Regular Session

Georgia Senate Bill SB116

Introduced
2/8/23  
Refer
2/9/23  
Introduced
2/8/23  
Report Pass
2/22/23  
Refer
2/9/23  
Engrossed
2/27/23  
Report Pass
2/22/23  
Report Pass
3/9/23  
Engrossed
2/27/23  
Enrolled
4/5/23  
Report Pass
3/9/23  
Chaptered
5/1/23  
Enrolled
4/5/23  
Chaptered
5/1/23  

Caption

Disposition of Municipal Property; the maximum term of certain leases or contracts for the use of property owned by a municipality for recreational facilities; provisions

Impact

The changes outlined in SB116 facilitate municipal corporations to enter into leasing agreements for a maximum term of 20 years without a renewal period for properties designated for arenas, sports fields, and similar recreational facilities. This shift aims to improve the financial and operational management of municipal properties while allowing for more significant investments in recreational infrastructure. Depending on the local governance structure, this could significantly alter how communities manage and utilize their recreational resources.

Summary

Senate Bill 116 proposes amendments to the Official Code of Georgia regarding the disposition of municipal property. The bill primarily focuses on revising the terms related to leasing or contracting for the use, operation, or management of real or personal property owned by municipalities specifically for recreational purposes. With this amendment, municipalities may selectively engage in long-term leases and contracts beyond previous restrictions, which could enhance the management of community recreational facilities.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB116 appears supportive among municipalities eager to leverage their properties for long-term contracts, as it grants them the flexibility to better manage recreational assets. Stakeholders, particularly in local government, see the bill as a means to modernize and secure ongoing community funding through extended leases. However, there may still be concerns regarding transparency and ensuring that the bidding process remains fair and competitive.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential for disputes over local governance autonomy, where critics might argue that such broad powers may lead to mismanagement or unfavorable terms for municipalities if not closely monitored. Opponents of similar bills have cautioned against a lack of community input on such long-term leases, emphasizing the need for checks and balances to prevent the potential exploitation of public resources.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1551

Property assessments: requirements and disclosures.

CA SB476

California Financing Law: program administrators.

CA SB242

Property Assessed Clean Energy program: program administrator.

IN SB0244

Surety bond for home improvement suppliers.

TX HB3993

Relating to lease-option contracts.

CA AB968

Single-family residential property: disclosures.

WV SB500

Regulating land installment contracts for sale of real estate

HI HB2088

Relating To Financing.