"Georgia Work and Family Credit Act"; enact
If enacted, SB118 is anticipated to relieve some financial burden from families by allowing refundable tax credits, which could enhance disposable income for many taxpayers. The new provisions would mean that families could receive refunds even if their state tax liability does not fully utilize the available credits. This shift aligns with broader trends of tax reform aimed at supporting working families and promoting economic stability. Additionally, by integrating the state credits with existing federal tax provisions, the bill seeks to create a more cohesive tax structure for households with children.
In essence, SB118 represents a forward step towards recognizing the economic challenges faced by families with dependents in Georgia. By including provisions for refundable tax credits that directly correlate with federal tax credits, the bill potentially enhances both financial sustainability and incentivizes work among parents. The General Assembly's discussions and eventual decisions regarding this bill will ultimately reflect the state's priorities in supporting working families while balancing fiscal responsibility.
Senate Bill 118, titled the 'Georgia Work and Family Credit Act', proposes significant amendments to the state income tax regulations specifically concerning tax credits for child and dependent care expenses. The bill aims to establish state income tax credits that are calculated as a percentage of the federal credits available for child tax credits and earned income tax credits. Notably, it proposes a state tax credit equal to 25 percent of the federal child tax credit and 20 percent of the federal earned income tax credit. This initiative is designed to provide more financial support to families in Georgia, particularly those with dependents requiring child care.
The proposal is not without contention. Supporters argue that the tax credits could lead to increased economic activity as families have more resources to spend, which could positively affect local economies. However, opponents might raise concerns regarding the potential fiscal impact on state revenue, emphasizing a need for careful budget consideration. Furthermore, there may be discussions surrounding the adequacy of credit levels, as some advocates for low-income families might argue that the specified percentages do not sufficiently meet the cost of living related to child care expenses, thereby continuing to pose challenges for many families.