Georgia Technology Authority; authority to conduct certain fingerprint criminal background checks of all current and prospective employees; require
By instituting these requirements, SB 181 significantly enhances the security protocols surrounding taxpayer information. The bill mandates that background checks for employees must occur at least once every five years, while checks for contractors and subcontractors must happen at least once every ten years. Beginning January 1, 2025, the authority can conduct background checks on all current and prospective employees at its discretion. This measure aims to ensure that only individuals without criminal backgrounds are granted access to sensitive tax information, thereby bolstering public trust in the state's handling of tax documents.
Senate Bill 181 amends Chapter 25 of Title 50 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated. It grants the Georgia Technology Authority the authority to conduct fingerprint criminal background checks on all current and prospective employees, contractors, and subcontractors who have access to state or federal tax documents. This legislation is in response to an audit by the Internal Revenue Service which highlighted that some employees and contractors were accessing tax documents without undergoing the necessary background checks, thus raising security concerns about the handling of sensitive information.
The general sentiment surrounding SB 181 appears to be supportive, given the focus on enhancing security measures related to sensitive tax documents. The recognition of existing vulnerabilities based on the IRS audit seems to have created a consensus on the importance of implementing such checks. Legislators and watchdog groups are likely to view this bill favorably as a proactive step in safeguarding taxpayer information against potential mishandling or violations of privacy.
While the bill is largely seen as a necessary measure, there could be concerns regarding the implementation of fingerprint checks, especially related to privacy and the potential burden on current employees and contractors. Questions may arise about how thoroughly the checks will be conducted and the potential implications for employment if a background check reveals disqualifying information. Some stakeholders may also debate the effectiveness of these measures, especially considering the anticipated frequency of checks and the management of personal data.