Georgia 2023-2024 Regular Session

Georgia Senate Bill SB205

Introduced
2/16/23  
Refer
2/21/23  
Introduced
2/16/23  
Report Pass
1/12/24  
Refer
2/21/23  
Engrossed
2/8/24  
Report Pass
1/12/24  
Report Pass
3/7/24  
Engrossed
2/8/24  
Enrolled
4/2/24  
Report Pass
3/7/24  
Chaptered
4/23/24  
Enrolled
4/2/24  
Chaptered
4/23/24  

Caption

Funeral Directors and Embalmers; reinstatement of a lapsed funeral director's license; change provisions

Impact

The proposed changes aim to streamline the process for reinstating a funeral director's license, which could have significant implications for those who have been out of practice for an extended period. By reducing barriers to reinstatement, the bill encourages professionals to return to the field, potentially addressing workforce shortages in the funeral services industry. This law impacts existing state laws governing licensing and may contribute to increased regulatory efficiency for the professions of funeral directing and embalming.

Summary

Senate Bill 205 amends existing provisions related to the reinstatement of lapsed licenses for funeral directors and embalmers in Georgia. The bill allows individuals who have let their licenses lapse for up to ten years to reinstate their licenses by paying all renewal fees owed during that period, in addition to a reinstatement fee. Furthermore, applicants are required to complete any continuing education hours mandated by the board, unless they qualify for a waiver under specific circumstances.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding SB205 appears to be generally positive, with support primarily stemming from industry professionals and associations that represent funeral directors and embalmers. Advocates view this bill as a necessary adjustment to help practitioners who may have had personal or professional reasons for their licenses lapsing. Conversely, concerns may arise regarding the adequacy of required continuing education and the implications of such a reinstatement policy for public safety and service quality.

Contention

Although there has been strong support for the bill, discussions could emerge about the sufficiency of the requirements imposed for reinstatement, particularly regarding the mandatory continuing education. Opponents might argue that these requirements should be more stringent, ensuring that returning professionals are fully up-to-date with current practices and regulations. Additionally, there may be debates about the appropriateness of allowing reinstatement after a longer lapse, which could impact the standards and reputation of the profession.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.