Georgia 2023-2024 Regular Session

Georgia Senate Bill SB381

Introduced
1/23/24  
Refer
1/24/24  
Introduced
1/23/24  
Report Pass
2/8/24  
Refer
1/24/24  

Caption

"Assuring Quality in Government Act"; enact

Impact

The legislation could significantly alter how state government interactions are assessed and improved. By instituting mandatory satisfaction surveys, it creates a formal mechanism for gathering feedback from the public, which may lead to a greater emphasis on customer service within public agencies. The annual reporting of survey results to legislative committees aims to ensure that this feedback is not only collected but also reviewed and acted upon, enhancing transparency in government performance metrics.

Summary

SB381, known as the 'Assuring Quality in Government Act', aims to enhance the quality of public services provided by state offices in Georgia. The bill mandates that certain executive branch departments and agencies, along with specified commissioners, provide callers with an automated satisfaction survey following their phone interactions. The intent is to evaluate the courtesy of the representatives, the resolution of inquiries, employment viability of the staff, and wait times, thus fostering a culture of accountability and quality in government services.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB381 appears to be supportive, particularly among legislators who prioritize government accountability and customer service. Advocates argue that the bill is a progressive step towards modernizing state services and making them more user-centric. However, some concerns regarding the implementation and potential bureaucratic complications of such survey systems may arise among opponents, who fear it could impose additional burdens on agencies already stretched thin.

Contention

Debate surrounding SB381 may hinge on issues regarding the practicality of implementing the automated survey system and the usefulness of the data collected. Critics could argue whether the survey questions adequately reflect the quality of service or if they might lead to biased interpretations of agency performance, based on variable responses. Nonetheless, proponents of the bill contend that this initiative is necessary for a more responsive and efficient government structure.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.