Georgia 2023-2024 Regular Session

Georgia Senate Bill SB437

Introduced
1/31/24  
Refer
2/1/24  
Introduced
1/31/24  
Report Pass
2/26/24  
Refer
2/1/24  
Engrossed
2/29/24  
Report Pass
2/26/24  
Report Pass
3/7/24  
Engrossed
2/29/24  

Caption

Department of Agriculture; enforce certain criminal laws; authorize

Impact

This legislation marks a significant shift in how hemp products are regulated in Georgia, aiming to provide clarity and enforceability for state laws. The bill mandates that any consumable hemp product sold must meet strict standards, including maximum contaminant levels and labeling requirements. By prohibiting the sale of such products to individuals under the age of 21, it seeks to protect younger populations from potential harms associated with hemp consumption. The bill also enables random inspections to ensure that sellers comply with these new regulations.

Summary

SB437 seeks to amend the official code of Georgia to establish comprehensive regulations governing consumable hemp products. It empowers the Georgia Department of Agriculture to enforce specific criminal laws related to these products, provides for definitions and processes for determining THC levels, and establishes penalties for non-compliance. The bill aims to ensure consumer safety and proper labeling through mandatory certificates of analysis and inspection of hemp products sold in the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB437 is generally supportive among regulatory authorities who view it as a necessary step toward creating a safer product environment. Advocates argue that these regulations are crucial for protecting public health and safety. However, there may be concerns from small businesses and sellers regarding the financial burden of compliance and the potential impact on their operations.

Contention

While the bill has broad support for its intent to regulate consumable hemp products and create accountability, there are notable points of contention related to the feasibility of strict enforcement measures and the implications of new penalties for violations. Critics may argue that the added regulatory burdens could stifle small businesses and complicate the marketplace. Additionally, discussions may arise about the appropriateness of the law enforcement powers vested in the Department of Agriculture and the implications for local businesses.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1419

Pesticides: penalties for violations: civil penalty.

CA AB1919

Pesticides: enforcement actions: civil penalty: judicial review.

CA AB933

Food and agriculture omnibus bill.

NJ S2190

Establishes ReadyReturn Program; requires Taxation to prepare initial tax filing for certain taxpayers; requires several State agencies to use tax data to facilitate identification and enrollment for certain social services programs; makes an appropriation.

NJ S1008

Establishes ReadyReturn Program; requires Taxation to prepare initial tax filing for certain taxpayers; requires several State agencies to use tax data to facilitate identification and enrollment for certain social services programs; makes an appropriation.

CA AB419

Food and agriculture.

CA AB1583

California Seed Law: subventions: sunset extension.

MA H132

Relative to food justice with jobs