Georgia Senate Bill SB47

Georgia 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/23
• Refer: 1/31/23
• Report Pass: 2/7/23
• Engrossed: 2/15/23
• Report Pass: 3/15/23
• Enrolled: 4/5/23
• Chaptered: 5/1/23
• Passed: 5/1/23

Caption

Offenses Against Public Health And Morals; vaping in restricted areas is a misdemeanor punishable by fine; provide

Impact

The bill's enactment could lead to more comprehensive enforcement of smoke-free air regulations across Georgia. By clearly defining smoking and the products involved, local authorities would have a clearer framework to implement and enforce laws against smoking in restricted areas. This could further protect non-smokers from the harmful effects of secondhand smoke and aerosol, as well as align state regulations with contemporary understandings of public health risks associated with these products.

Summary

Senate Bill 47 aims to amend the definitions related to smoke-free air regulation in Georgia's Official Code. The key changes include the revision of existing definitions and the addition of new ones, particularly concerning what constitutes 'smoking.' This is intended to include various tobacco products and electronic devices that produce aerosol or vapor, thus adapting to changes in smoking habits and technologies. The bill represents a significant push towards stricter regulations on smoking and vaping in public spaces.

Sentiment

Discussion around SB 47 has primarily focused on public health benefits versus individual freedoms. Proponents view the bill as a necessary step to safeguard community health, aiming to reduce smoking-related diseases and promote overall well-being. Conversely, there are concerns raised about personal freedom and the potential for increased penalties against individuals, particularly regarding the use of electronic smoking devices. This sentiment reflects a broader societal conflict over public health initiatives and individual rights.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the delivery of penalties for violating the smoke-free policies outlined in SB 47. There are arguments from civil liberties advocates fearing the financial implications and restrictions on smoking choices, especially in private venues. Additionally, stakeholders in the tobacco and vaping industries have expressed concerns about the economic impact of such regulations. These discussions highlight the delicate balance between enforcing public health measures and respecting individual rights.