Water Rights; the public trust doctrine; remove references
By redefining the responsibilities related to transcript preparation, SB542 potentially reduces ambiguity in appellate procedures. It specifies that if an appellant omits certain matters, the appellee may file a designation to include them within a defined timeframe. This change is expected to expedite the appeals process, making it more efficient, and may help alleviate backlog issues in the court system. Furthermore, it could lead to increased clarity around what evidence must be included in appeals, thus potentially reducing future disputes over missing documentation.
SB542, known as 'The Terry Act', amends Code Section 5-6-42 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated. The primary focus of this bill is to alter the procedure regarding the preparation and filing of transcripts of evidence and proceedings in cases where an appellant designates certain matters to be omitted from the record on appeal. This bill aims to clarify and streamline the process, ensuring that parties involved in an appeal can effectively manage the record that is presented in court.
The sentiment around SB542 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among legal professionals who emphasize the importance of a streamlined appeals process. However, some concerns were raised by those who worry about the implications for access to justice, particularly for self-represented litigants who may struggle with the complexities introduced in managing transcript requests. Those in favor believe that the clarifications will ultimately serve to benefit the legal system by promoting efficiency.
Notable points of contention during discussions centered on how the changes might impact litigants' ability to challenge decisions in lower courts effectively. Critics voiced concerns about the potential burden on appellants, especially if the responsibility for ensuring comprehensive records lies too heavily on them. They fear that the new amendments could inadvertently create barriers for those who cannot afford legal representation, thus impacting the principle of fair access to justice in Georgia's legal system.