Georgia 2025-2026 Regular Session

Georgia House Bill HB129

Introduced
1/27/25  
Report Pass
2/26/25  
Engrossed
3/4/25  
Refer
3/6/25  
Report Pass
3/25/25  
Report Pass
3/31/25  
Enrolled
4/10/25  
Chaptered
5/14/25  

Caption

Ad valorem tax; bona fide conservation use property; remove a limitation on leased property as to certain entities

Impact

The bill not only amends the existing tax credit structure for postproduction companies but also renews and modifies the caps on tax credits available for these companies. For taxable years starting from 2026, the bill stipulates annual caps on tax credits that can be claimed, ensuring a controlled distribution of benefits to encourage postproduction activities within the state. This dual impact on conservation and tax credits illustrates a blend of environmental sustainability with economic incentive.

Summary

House Bill 129 aims to amend sections of the Official Code of Georgia pertaining to the taxation of properties used for bona fide conservation purposes. One significant change proposed in the bill is the removal of restrictions on leased properties, specifically allowing certain entities to qualify for preferential property assessments. This alteration is designed to broaden the scope of properties eligible for conservation use assessments, increasing land use flexibility for owners while incentivizing conservation efforts.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 129 appears to be largely positive among proponents who argue that the bill supports agricultural and environmental initiatives by promoting conservation practices. However, there is a noted concern from some legislators and advocacy groups about the implications of relaxing requirements for leased properties, fearing that it may lead to misuse or overextension of conservation claims, thereby undermining the integrity of the program.

Contention

The primary contention surrounding HB 129 revolves around the balance between incentivizing land conservation and ensuring accountability in its application. Supporters highlight the benefits of increased flexibility for landowners, while opponents raise concerns regarding potential exploitation of the conservation tax incentives. The debate centers on ensuring that changes to the legal framework adequately protect the intent of conservation efforts while promoting economic activities linked to land use.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2013

Property taxation: new construction: damaged or destroyed property.

CA AB1500

Property taxation: application of base year value: disaster relief.

CA AB245

Property taxation: application of base year value: disaster relief.

DC B25-0486

Uniform Community Property Disposition at Death Act of 2023

CA SB964

Property tax: tax-defaulted property sales.

CA SB603

Property taxation: transfer of base year value: disaster relief.

CA SB1091

Property taxation: transfer of base year value: disaster relief.

HI HB1398

Relating To Property.