Georgia 2025-2026 Regular Session

Georgia House Bill HB158

Introduced
1/28/25  

Caption

Commerce and trade; filing of registration statements with the office of the Secretary of State; provide

Impact

HB158 will impact the way businesses register their trade names in Georgia, requiring all filings to be done electronically as of January 1, 2026. This move towards digital registration is expected to reduce paperwork and enhance the accessibility of registration records, improving public access to vital business information. Additionally, the bill allows for the reregistration of previously registered trade names to be included in the new state-wide registry, which aims to consolidate and simplify the current registration system.

Summary

House Bill 158 aims to amend existing laws relating to the registration of businesses using trade names in Georgia. The bill proposes the development of a state-wide automated information system for the registration of trade names, which is overseen by the Georgia Superior Court Clerks' Cooperative Authority. This system is intended to standardize the filing process while allowing businesses to register, amend, or cancel their trade names electronically, which streamlines the registration process significantly. The bill stipulates that every business must file an initial registration statement verified by affidavit and that this filing must occur before a business begins operating under that name.

Sentiment

The reception of HB158 in the legislative discussions reflects a sense of optimism regarding the modernization of the business registration process. Supporters argue that the bill will lead to greater transparency and efficiency, potentially attracting new businesses to Georgia by making it easier to comply with registration requirements. However, there are concerns about implementation logistics and ensuring that older methods of filing are phased out without disadvantaging smaller businesses that may struggle with digital adoption.

Contention

Despite the overall positive sentiment, there is contention regarding the transition to a fully electronic system. Critics caution that some businesses, particularly smaller enterprises and those in rural areas with limited internet access, may face challenges in adapting to the new requirements. Additionally, questions remain about the financial implications of the fees associated with registration, amendments, or cancellations that are set to be prescribed under the new law. Balancing the need for efficient governance with the necessity for affordability and local accessibility is a critical point for ongoing discussions as the bill moves forward.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

DE SB291

An Act To Amend Title 6 Of The Delaware Code Relating To The Registration Of Trade Names, Partnerships And Associations In The Superior Court.

CA SB1340

Discrimination.

CA AB2882

California Community Corrections Performance Incentives.

CA AB946

Chief probation officer: designee.

CA SB30

Domestic partnership.

CA AB662

Restitution: tracking.

CA AB945

Criminal procedure: expungement of records.

NJ A5132

Permits clinical laboratories to provide certain patients discounts without affecting NJ FamilyCare reimbursement rates or violating NJ FamilyCare rebate prohibitions.