Georgia 2025-2026 Regular Session

Georgia House Bill HB174

Introduced
1/29/25  
Report Pass
2/5/25  
Engrossed
2/5/25  
Refer
2/6/25  
Report Pass
2/12/25  

Caption

Centerville, City of; Municipal Court; charge a technology fee

Impact

The introduction of this technology fee may significantly affect state laws regarding municipal funding and revenue generation. By allowing the court to charge this fee, it provides a legal framework through which local governments can seek to enhance their technological capabilities without relying solely on state or federal funding. Furthermore, the bill includes provisions to ensure that the funds collected are kept in a segregated account, promoting transparency and accountability in how these funds are spent, thus aligning with best practices in public financial management.

Summary

House Bill 174 authorizes the Municipal Court of the City of Centerville to impose a technology fee as a surcharge on criminal and quasi-criminal fines. This fee is intended to support the technological needs of both the municipal court and the police department, ensuring that they can maintain modern equipment necessary for their operations. The fee is capped at $5.00 and can be used for a variety of technology-related expenditures, including the acquisition and maintenance of computer hardware and software as well as communication and imaging equipment.

Sentiment

Initial discussions surrounding HB 174 appear positive, as it responds to the modernization needs of local courts and police departments. Supporters likely view this bill as a proactive step towards improving efficiency and service delivery. However, there may be concerns from some segments of the community about imposing additional fees, which can be perceived as burdensome for individuals already facing financial penalties through fines.

Contention

While there are no major points of contention highlighted in the documentation, it is important to note that similar bills elsewhere have faced criticism for potentially leading to increased costs for residents, especially those with limited financial means. The discussions may include voices advocating for a fully funded approach to technology upgrades without imposing fees on court users. However, in the context of HB 174, the focus remains on providing essential support for court operations in a manner that stays within limits approved by the state legislature.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.