Georgia House Bill HB224

Georgia 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/3/25
• Report Pass: 2/28/25
• Engrossed: 3/6/25
• Refer: 3/10/25
• Report Pass: 3/27/25
• Enrolled: 4/9/25
• Chaptered: 5/13/25
• Passed: 5/13/25

Caption

Highways, bridges, and ferries; construction or maintenance of roads upon military bases or installations paid for by the United States Department of Defense or other entities; authorize

Impact

The enactment of HB224 would significantly modify state law regarding highway provisions related to military infrastructure. It permits state agencies to engage in contracts and agreements specifically for construction and maintenance work funded by federal sources. This may streamline local and state engagement with military projects and bolster connection points for military transport and logistics within Georgia, effectively enhancing the state's role in supporting military endeavors.

Summary

House Bill 224 provides authorization for the Georgia Department of Transportation to construct or maintain roads on military bases or installations, specifically when such efforts are financed by the United States Department of Defense or another federal entity. This bill amends existing laws on highway provisions and is framed within the context of supporting military infrastructure and the logistical needs of military operations within the state. By allowing federal funding to facilitate this construction and maintenance, the bill aims to enhance military readiness and operational efficiency directly linked to transportation infrastructure.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB224 has been largely supportive, particularly among lawmakers interested in bolstering military presence and infrastructure within the state. Proponents argue that the bill aligns local efforts with national defense needs, facilitating improved military logistics. There hasn’t appeared to be significant organized opposition, suggesting that the bill enjoys a form of bipartisan recognition of the strategic importance of military infrastructure in Georgia.

Contention

While HB224 received broad support, potential points of contention could arise regarding resource allocation and prioritization of state funding for military projects over community needs. Critics could argue that reliance on federal funding for state-directed projects may limit local control or create conflicts of interest in managing state transportation priorities versus military directives. However, overall discussions surrounding the bill do not showcase substantial localized contention, primarily focusing on facilitating military processes.