Georgia House Bill HB549

Georgia 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/20/25
• Report Pass: 2/27/25
• Engrossed: 3/6/25
• Refer: 3/10/25
• Report Pass: 3/13/25

Caption

Peace officers; extend time frame for which reimbursement of total training expenses by a subsequent employer may be sought

Impact

The proposed changes are intended to alleviate the financial burden on initial employers of peace officers—whether state, county, or local governments—by allowing them to recoup some of the expenses associated with training. This, in turn, is expected to incentivize the retention of trained peace officers within their original employing agency, thereby promoting stability within law enforcement departments. Furthermore, by clearly outlining the reimbursement process and specifications for eligible expenses, the bill aims to standardize practices across various law enforcement agencies in Georgia.

Summary

House Bill 549 aims to amend the existing provisions relating to the reimbursement of training expenses for peace officers by extending the time frame within which a subsequent employer can seek reimbursement. Specifically, the bill stipulates that if a peace officer is employed by another agency within 36 months after completing their mandated or formalized training, the new agency is responsible for fully reimbursing the training costs. For hires occurring between 15 to 24 months post-training, they are required to reimburse only half of those costs. This amendment is expected to encourage accountability among hiring agencies regarding the costs they incur when employing officers who are newly trained.

Contention

While the bill may receive support for aiming to protect public funds and ensure trained officers are retained, there may be concerns regarding its implications for workforce mobility. Opponents could argue that such financial barriers might deter peace officers from seeking employment opportunities elsewhere within the state, impeding individual career progression and limiting the ability of agencies to hire highly trained personnel from other jurisdictions. Furthermore, questions may arise about the bill's requirements for reimbursement standards as set by councils and whether these standards will adequately reflect the actual expenses incurred by the original training agencies.