Georgia House Bill HB704

Georgia 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/3/25
• Report Pass: 3/6/25

Caption

State government; auditor produce certain monthly and annual reports; replace requirement

Impact

The implications of HB 704 are multifaceted. For state agencies and the General Assembly, the annual reports would provide a consolidated view of contract awards to architectural and engineering firms, offering insights into trends and the distribution of state contracts. However, critics may raise concerns about reducing the frequency of these reports, questioning whether annual oversights could lead to missed opportunities for timely assessments and adjustments to state contracting practices.

Summary

House Bill 704 seeks to amend existing statutes regarding the obligations of the state auditor in maintaining statistics on architectural and engineering firms that do business with the state of Georgia. One of the central changes proposed in the bill is the transition from monthly to annual reporting for the state auditor regarding these firms. This amendment aims to streamline the reporting process, potentially minimizing the resources required for frequent updates while still ensuring that the necessary information is collected for legislative oversight.

Contention

Notably, the bill also addresses the eligibility criteria for architectural and engineering firms based on their amount of state business. Specifically, firms that secure more than 10% of total awarded contracts within a defined period face restrictions on future bidding opportunities until their share decreases. This provision aims to promote a diverse bidding environment among firms but could also raise issues related to fairness and accessibility in publicly funded contracts.

Summary_conclusion

Overall, the adjustments proposed by HB 704 reflect ongoing efforts to refine how state contracts are awarded and overseen. While streamlining reporting is an appealing proposition, stakeholders will need to weigh the benefits of reduced administrative burden against the potential risks of less frequent oversight and scrutiny of contracts awarded to architectural and engineering firms.