"Quality Basic Education Act,"; disclosure of public student directory information to political candidates or persons or groups acting on their behalf; prohibit
Impact
This legislation marks a significant shift in the regulatory landscape of electoral and educational policy within the state. By restricting access to student directory information, the bill aims to protect students from being targeted by political campaigns or actions. It seeks to bolster the integrity of the voter registration process in schools and safeguard students from manipulation by political interests. The requirement for attestations adds an additional layer of accountability for individuals involved in guiding students through the voter registration process, which may lead to a more informed electorate in the long term.
Summary
Senate Bill 212 amends several provisions under the Georgia 'Quality Basic Education Act' and other election laws concerning the disclosure of public student directory information. The bill specifically prohibits local school systems and public schools from disclosing student directory information to political candidates and related political entities. This move is aimed at enhancing privacy protections for students while curbing potential political exploitation of school resources during election cycles. The bill also imposes requirements for written attestations from individuals who assist students with voter registration, ensuring that such information is not misused for political gain.
Sentiment
The overall sentiment around SB 212 appears to be cautious and somewhat divisive. Supporters, including legislative sponsors, argue that the bill is necessary to protect the privacy of students and to prevent the politicization of educational environments. Critics, however, may view the bill as overly restrictive or potentially limiting to civic engagement among students. There is a consistent concern among some stakeholders regarding how these changes will affect students' understanding of political processes and their engagement in civic duties, such as voting.
Contention
Contention surrounding SB 212 primarily revolves around the balance between protecting student rights and ensuring robust civic engagement. While proponents laud the bill for preventing inappropriate solicitation and protecting minors, detractors raise concerns about the potential chilling effect on political discourse and students' involvement in the democratic process. Moreover, the burden of additional paperwork for voter registration assistance prompted discussions about the practical implications of these new regulations on school personnel and their ability to engage students meaningfully in civic programs.
Elections; political committees shall require disclosures on content or postings made by social media personalities that are paid for by such candidate or committee; provide
Education; provide for a cause of action by aggrieved students against local education agencies for breach of duty to provide an adequate public education
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
A concurrent resolution recognizing wild rice as sacred and central to the culture and health of Indigenous Peoples in Minnesota and critical to the health and identity of all Minnesota citizens and ecosystems and establishing a commitment to passing legislation to protect wild rice and the freshwater resources upon which it depends.