Georgia 2025-2026 Regular Session

Georgia Senate Bill SB345

Introduced
3/19/25  
Refer
3/20/25  
Report Pass
3/27/25  
Engrossed
3/27/25  
Report Pass
4/2/25  

Caption

Magistrate Court of Crawford County; the assessment and collection of a technology fee; authorize

Impact

Upon enactment, SB345 will have a significant impact on local legislation regarding how technology is funded within the Magistrate Court of Crawford County. The funds collected will be segregated and exclusively allocated for technology improvements, ensuring that the court evolves in its capability to serve the public effectively. The bill sets a sunset provision for the technology fee, terminating its collection after July 1, 2035, which allows for a reassessment of the funding needs in the future.

Summary

Senate Bill 345 aims to authorize the Magistrate Court of Crawford County to assess and collect a technology fee. This fee will be used to enhance the technological capabilities of the court by funding necessary improvements such as the purchase and maintenance of computer hardware and software, imaging equipment, and the digitization of court records. With a proposed maximum fee of $5 for civil filing and as a surcharge on fines, the bill establishes a dedicated fund for these technological enhancements.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB345 appears to be positive, primarily stemming from the support for improved access to court services through technology. Local stakeholders understand the importance of modernizing court infrastructure, particularly in terms of digital access to court records, which aligns with broader trends in public bureaucracy toward transparency and efficiency.

Contention

While there appears to be support for the bill, notable points of contention may arise regarding the financial burden on users of the Magistrate Court, particularly those who may find filing fees and surcharges challenging. Critics might argue that even modest fees can create barriers to access for low-income individuals, while proponents assert that the long-term benefits of enhanced court technology and accessibility outweigh short-term concerns.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.