Georgia 2025-2026 Regular Session

Georgia Senate Bill SB46

Introduced
1/28/25  
Refer
1/29/25  
Report Pass
2/13/25  
Engrossed
3/3/25  
Report Pass
3/20/25  
Enrolled
4/10/25  
Vetoed
5/14/25  

Caption

"Government Serves the People Act"; enact

Impact

The passage of SB 46 will have a significant impact on the operational framework of state agencies, requiring them to appoint their own lead agency service delivery officials. These officials will be tasked with implementing improvements in government service delivery, particularly for high-impact service programs. Furthermore, agencies will need to report on their service delivery efforts annually, thereby fostering accountability and enabling continuous assessment of government services. This move is part of a broader strategy to ensure that all government services are responsive to the public's needs.

Summary

Senate Bill 46, known as the 'Government Serves the People Act', aims to enhance the delivery of government services in Georgia. The bill establishes the appointment of a State of Georgia Government Service Delivery Lead within the Georgia Technology Authority, who will oversee and coordinate efforts to improve government service delivery across various state agencies. This initiative is focused on enhancing efficiency, transparency, and accessibility of government services to better meet the needs of residents and businesses within the state.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding SB 46 has been positive, with many stakeholders viewing the bill as a necessary step towards modernizing government services and making them more user-friendly. Proponents argue that the centralized approach will lead to better coordination and a standardized quality of services provided across the state. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the implementation and effectiveness of these new structures, particularly in ensuring that the appointed officials are empowered to make meaningful changes within their respective agencies.

Contention

There may be potential points of contention regarding the bill, especially concerning how effectively the proposed changes will be integrated within existing agency frameworks. Critics may argue that without sufficient resources and authorities granted to the service delivery leads, the bill's goals could be undermined. Additionally, debates could arise regarding the necessity of these measures, as some may believe that existing systems already adequately address service delivery needs. Overall, while there is support for improving service delivery in Georgia, the practical implications of SB 46 will likely garner further discussion.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ S2273

Requires delivery network company to maintain certain automobile insurance.

NJ A5213

Requires delivery network companies to maintain automobile insurance.

NJ A2809

Requires delivery network companies to maintain automobile insurance.

NJ S486

Requires delivery network company to maintain certain automobile insurance.

NJ A3594

Requires food delivery network company to maintain certain automobile insurance.

NJ A2793

Requires food delivery network company to maintain certain automobile insurance.

CA SB1490

Food delivery platforms.

CA AB1360

Third-party food delivery.