Georgia Senate Bill SB64

Georgia 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/29/25
• Refer: 1/30/25
• Report Pass: 2/6/25
• Report Pass: 3/3/25

Caption

Local Government and State Government; certain transactions between government entities and certain foreign persons; prohibit

Impact

If enacted, SB64 will have significant implications for local and state government operations. Beginning January 1, 2028, local government entities are restricted from acquiring unmanned aircraft systems from covered foreign entities, while state funds are barred from being used in association with such systems. This shifts procurement practices, particularly in technology sectors, and presents a legal framework that prioritizes security concerns over potential cost advantages in sourcing from foreign suppliers.

Summary

Senate Bill 64 (SB64) aims to strengthen national security by prohibiting government entities in Georgia from engaging in certain transactions with foreign adversaries, specifically entities connected to China and Russia. The bill amends Titles 36 and 50 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, introducing restrictions on the acquisition and use of small unmanned aircraft systems manufactured by covered foreign entities as defined within the legislation. It also disallows such entities from bidding on state contracts for goods and services, thereby reinforcing a broader strategy to mitigate risks associated with foreign influence on state operations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB64 appears strongly supportive among various legislative members, particularly those emphasizing national security and economic independence. However, discussions may have included concerns regarding potential overreach and implications for local governments' ability to make technology choices that best fit their operational needs. While proponents view the bill as a necessary safeguard, critics may highlight unintended consequences for local governance and innovation.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB64 might include debates over the definition of 'covered foreign entities' and the implications of labeling China and Russia as such adversaries. There can also be concerns regarding compliance for existing contracts and the practicality of transitioning away from already acquired unmanned aircraft systems. Moreover, the prohibitive nature of the bill raises questions about innovation and the ability of local governments to engage with international technology markets.