Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB1659

Introduced
1/24/22  
Refer
1/26/22  
Report Pass
2/17/22  
Refer
2/17/22  
Report Pass
3/4/22  
Engrossed
3/4/22  

Caption

Relating To Land Leases.

Impact

If enacted, HB 1659 would directly impact the management and negotiation processes for pasture leases in Hawaii. It emphasizes public purposes such as promoting sustainable food practices and enhancing resource availability. The potential effects of the bill include an increased availability of agricultural lands for lease, which could bolster local agriculture and food production initiatives while reducing bureaucratic delays historically associated with land management.

Summary

House Bill 1659 seeks to amend and extend existing pasture leases in Hawaii, specifically providing authorization for the board of land and natural resources to amend and extend these leases for up to sixty-five years. This bill is a response to previous legislative acts aimed at managing non-agricultural park lands, particularly those areas that have yet to be transferred or properly utilized since the inception of Act 90 in 2003. The aim is to streamline the leasing process and enhance the agricultural use of certain lands while also addressing the provision of sustainable food production and preservation of natural resources.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1659 appears to be cautiously optimistic, as it is positioned as a supportive legislative measure for agricultural development and resource management in Hawaii. Stakeholders who support the bill likely view it as a necessary step towards more effective use of land resources, fostering sustainable practices. Conversely, potential opposition may arise from those concerned about land use, development implications, or differing interests in natural resource management.

Contention

The principal contention around HB 1659 may stem from the nuances of land use rights and how lease terms are negotiated. Critics may argue that the extended duration of up to sixty-five years for pasture leases could favor larger agricultural businesses at the expense of smaller or local farmers. Additionally, there could be concerns about how the valuation of agricultural uses is determined in the setting of lease rents, which could influence market dynamics and access to leasing opportunities for local stakeholders.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2106

Institutional purchasers: sale of California produce.

MS HB1055

Regulatory Sandbox Agricultural Innovation Pilot Program; establish.

CA SB1308

Public educational institutions: purchase of nondomestic agricultural food products.

CA AB778

Institutional purchasers: purchase of California-grown agricultural food products.

CA AB1025

Institutional purchasers: purchase of domestic agricultural food products.

CA AB822

Institutional purchasers: sale of California produce.

HI HB1584

Relating To Agriculture.

HI SB2363

Relating To Agriculture.