Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB1705

Introduced
1/24/22  
Refer
1/26/22  
Report Pass
2/7/22  
Refer
2/7/22  
Report Pass
2/17/22  
Refer
2/17/22  
Report Pass
3/3/22  
Engrossed
3/3/22  
Refer
3/8/22  
Report Pass
3/21/22  
Refer
3/21/22  
Report Pass
4/6/22  

Caption

Relating To Agricultural Park Leases.

Impact

The bill is designed to enhance the opportunities for farming and agricultural activity by extending lease terms, which can offer stability for farmers. For those leasing smaller parcels, this legislation can lead to long-term investment in agricultural practices, potentially improving the productivity of local farms. By ensuring that these farmers are not displaced due to short-term lease uncertainties, the bill aims to bolster local food production and contribute to the economy by sustaining agricultural lands for productive use.

Summary

House Bill 1705 addresses agricultural park leases, amending Section 166-11 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes. The bill aims to provide a mechanism for extending agricultural leases for lessees who currently hold a lease with a remaining term of fifteen years or less, specifically allowing for a thirty-year extension under certain conditions. This applies to parcels of land that are twenty-five acres or less and located in counties with populations below five hundred thousand, thereby targeting smaller agricultural operations and promoting sustainability in these communities.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment towards HB 1705 reflects a support for the agricultural sector, especially considering its focus on small farmers and the local economy. Advocates view the bill as a positive step towards providing necessary security for agricultural producers and fostering economic growth in lesser-populated counties. However, there may be concerns from stakeholders about whether the bill does enough to address broader economic challenges faced by the agricultural community, such as access to resources and market competition.

Contention

While the bill is generally viewed favorably, some points of contention may arise regarding the limitations on eligible lands and the specific population threshold outlined for counties. Critics might argue that by restricting eligibility to certain areas, the bill inadvertently excludes some agricultural operators who may also be in need of lease stability. Additionally, the effectiveness of the measures in prompting agricultural growth will need to be assessed once implemented, to see if they meet the diverse needs of the farming community.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2106

Institutional purchasers: sale of California produce.

MS HB1055

Regulatory Sandbox Agricultural Innovation Pilot Program; establish.

CA AB778

Institutional purchasers: purchase of California-grown agricultural food products.

CA SB1308

Public educational institutions: purchase of nondomestic agricultural food products.

CA AB1025

Institutional purchasers: purchase of domestic agricultural food products.

CA AB822

Institutional purchasers: sale of California produce.

HI SB2363

Relating To Agriculture.

HI HB1584

Relating To Agriculture.