Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB2192 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.

Old	New	Differences
1	1	HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES H.B. NO. 2192 THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2022 STATE OF HAWAII A BILL FOR AN ACT relating to coercive control. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
2	2
3	3	HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES H.B. NO. 2192
4	4	THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2022
5	5	STATE OF HAWAII
6	6
7	7	HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
8	8
9	9	H.B. NO.
10	10
11	11	2192
12	12
13	13	THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2022
14	14
15	15
16	16
17	17	STATE OF HAWAII
18	18
19	19
20	20
21	21
22	22
23	23
24	24
25	25
26	26
27	27
28	28
29	29
30	30
31	31	A BILL FOR AN ACT
32	32
33	33
34	34
35	35
36	36
37	37	relating to coercive control.
38	38
39	39
40	40
41	41
42	42
43	43	BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
44	44
45	45
46	46
47	47	SECTION 1. The legislature finds that when child custody is under consideration, courts should also be aware that coercive control is a tactic that has been used by perpetrators to harm and exploit their partner and children's wellbeing. When courts are evaluating the best and safest way to issue custody orders, acts of coercive control should be included in the analysis. The purpose of this Act is to add coercive control to the list of factors to be considered by the court in determining what constitutes the best interest of the child. SECTION 2. Section 571-46, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (b) to read as follows: "(b) In determining what constitutes the best interest of the child under this section, the court shall consider, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Any history of sexual or physical abuse of a child by a parent; (2) Any history of neglect or emotional abuse of a child by a parent; (3) The overall quality of the parent-child relationship; (4) The history of caregiving or parenting by each parent prior and subsequent to a marital or other type of separation; (5) Each parent's cooperation in developing and implementing a plan to meet the child's ongoing needs, interests, and schedule; provided that this factor shall not be considered in any case where the court has determined that family violence has been committed by a parent; (6) The physical health needs of the child; (7) The emotional needs of the child; (8) The safety needs of the child; (9) The educational needs of the child; (10) The child's need for relationships with siblings; (11) Each parent's actions demonstrating that they allow the child to maintain family connections through family events and activities; provided that this factor shall not be considered in any case where the court has determined that family violence has been committed by a parent; (12) Each parent's actions demonstrating that they separate the child's needs from the parent's needs; (13) Any evidence of past or current drug or alcohol abuse by a parent; (14) The mental health of each parent; (15) The areas and levels of conflict present within the family; [and] (16) A parent's prior wilful misuse of the protection from abuse process under chapter 586 to gain a tactical advantage in any proceeding involving the custody determination of a minor. Such wilful misuse may be considered only if it is established by clear and convincing evidence, and if it is further found by clear and convincing evidence that in the particular family circumstance the wilful misuse tends to show that, in the future, the parent who engaged in the wilful misuse will not be able to cooperate successfully with the other parent in their shared responsibilities for the child. The court shall articulate findings of fact whenever relying upon this factor as part of its determination of the best interests of the child. For the purposes of this section, when taken alone, the voluntary dismissal of a petition for protection from abuse shall not be treated as prima facie evidence that a wilful misuse of the protection from abuse process has occurred[.]; and (17) Any history of coercive control of the child or a parent of the child by the other parent. For the purposes of this paragraph "coercive control" shall have the same meaning as in section 586-1." SECTION 3. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date. SECTION 4. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect upon its approval. INTRODUCED BY: _____________________________
48	48
49	49	SECTION 1. The legislature finds that when child custody is under consideration, courts should also be aware that coercive control is a tactic that has been used by perpetrators to harm and exploit their partner and children's wellbeing. When courts are evaluating the best and safest way to issue custody orders, acts of coercive control should be included in the analysis.
50	50
51	51	The purpose of this Act is to add coercive control to the list of factors to be considered by the court in determining what constitutes the best interest of the child.
52	52
53	53	SECTION 2. Section 571-46, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (b) to read as follows:
54	54
55	55	"(b) In determining what constitutes the best interest of the child under this section, the court shall consider, but not be limited to, the following:
56	56
57	57	(1) Any history of sexual or physical abuse of a child by a parent;
58	58
59	59	(2) Any history of neglect or emotional abuse of a child by a parent;
60	60
61	61	(3) The overall quality of the parent-child relationship;
62	62
63	63	(4) The history of caregiving or parenting by each parent prior and subsequent to a marital or other type of separation;
64	64
65	65	(5) Each parent's cooperation in developing and implementing a plan to meet the child's ongoing needs, interests, and schedule; provided that this factor shall not be considered in any case where the court has determined that family violence has been committed by a parent;
66	66
67	67	(6) The physical health needs of the child;
68	68
69	69	(7) The emotional needs of the child;
70	70
71	71	(8) The safety needs of the child;
72	72
73	73	(9) The educational needs of the child;
74	74
75	75	(10) The child's need for relationships with siblings;
76	76
77	77	(11) Each parent's actions demonstrating that they allow the child to maintain family connections through family events and activities; provided that this factor shall not be considered in any case where the court has determined that family violence has been committed by a parent;
78	78
79	79	(12) Each parent's actions demonstrating that they separate the child's needs from the parent's needs;
80	80
81	81	(13) Any evidence of past or current drug or alcohol abuse by a parent;
82	82
83	83	(14) The mental health of each parent;
84	84
85	85	(15) The areas and levels of conflict present within the family; [and]
86	86
87	87	(16) A parent's prior wilful misuse of the protection from abuse process under chapter 586 to gain a tactical advantage in any proceeding involving the custody determination of a minor. Such wilful misuse may be considered only if it is established by clear and convincing evidence, and if it is further found by clear and convincing evidence that in the particular family circumstance the wilful misuse tends to show that, in the future, the parent who engaged in the wilful misuse will not be able to cooperate successfully with the other parent in their shared responsibilities for the child. The court shall articulate findings of fact whenever relying upon this factor as part of its determination of the best interests of the child. For the purposes of this section, when taken alone, the voluntary dismissal of a petition for protection from abuse shall not be treated as prima facie evidence that a wilful misuse of the protection from abuse process has occurred[.]; and
88	88
89	89	(17) Any history of coercive control of the child or a parent of the child by the other parent. For the purposes of this paragraph "coercive control" shall have the same meaning as in section 586-1."
90	90
91	91	SECTION 3. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date.
92	92
93	93	SECTION 4. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
94	94
95	95	SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
96	96
97	97
98	98
99	99	INTRODUCED BY: _____________________________
100	100
101	101	INTRODUCED BY:
102	102
103	103	_____________________________
104	104
105	105
106	106
107	107
108	108
109	109	Report Title: Judiciary; Coercive Control Description: Adds coercive control to the factors a court may consider in determining the best interest of the child. The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
110	110
111	111
112	112
113	113
114	114
115	115	Report Title:
116	116
117	117	Judiciary; Coercive Control
118	118
119	119
120	120
121	121	Description:
122	122
123	123	Adds coercive control to the factors a court may consider in determining the best interest of the child.
124	124
125	125
126	126
127	127
128	128
129	129
130	130
131	131	The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.