Relating To The Model State Right-to-repair Law.
If passed, the law would significantly impact the relationship between manufacturers and repair providers, limiting OEMs' ability to monopolize repair services. It explicitly states that OEMs must supply all relevant parts and documentation required for repairs, potentially lowering repair costs for consumers and expanding service options available through independent providers. Additionally, the enforcement of this law would be assigned to the Attorney General, who would handle violations as unfair practices, thus providing a legal framework to uphold the provisions of the legislation.
House Bill 2369 proposes the implementation of a Model State Right-to-Repair Law in Hawaii, aimed at addressing the limitations faced by independent repair providers and consumers of digital electronic equipment. The bill mandates that original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) provide necessary parts, tools, and documentation to independent repair providers and owners on 'fair and reasonable terms'. By establishing these obligations, the bill seeks to promote a competitive repair market and facilitate easier maintenance and repair of digital devices, ranging from smartphones to household electronics.
One of the main points of contention surrounding HB 2369 includes concerns about trade secrets and proprietary information. The bill limits the requirement for OEMs to divulge sensitive information, positing that they are not obliged to disclose trade secrets unless necessary for repair purposes. Critics may argue that this limitation could still impede independent repair efforts by restricting access to critical technical information. Moreover, the bill explicitly exempts motor vehicle manufacturers and their suppliers from its provisions, which may spark debate about the consistency of repair rights across various sectors of the technology and automotive industries.