Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB339 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1-HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES H.B. NO. 339 THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2021 H.D. 1 STATE OF HAWAII A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO THE FAMILY COURT. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
1+HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES H.B. NO. 339 THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2021 STATE OF HAWAII A BILL FOR AN ACT relating to the family court. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
22
33 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES H.B. NO. 339
4-THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2021 H.D. 1
4+THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2021
55 STATE OF HAWAII
66
77 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
88
99 H.B. NO.
1010
1111 339
1212
1313 THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2021
1414
15-H.D. 1
15+
1616
1717 STATE OF HAWAII
1818
1919
2020
2121
2222
2323
2424
2525
2626
2727
2828
2929
3030
3131 A BILL FOR AN ACT
3232
3333
3434
3535
3636
3737 relating to the family court.
3838
3939
4040
4141
4242
4343 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
4444
4545
4646
47- SECTION 1. The legislature finds that delays experienced by parents and children while awaiting the disposition of appeals from family court decisions could arguably violate the due process clauses of both the state and federal constitutions. Such delays conflict with the mission of the family court, which, as stated on the family court's website, is "to provide a fair, speedy, economical, and accessible forum for the resolution of matters involving families and children." The legislature further finds that in recent years, some parents and children have had to wait up to eight years for their cases to be resolved. For example, the delays between the filing of the family court order and the decision by the supreme court have lasted as long as: (1) Seven years and eight months in Cox v. Cox, 138 Hawaii 476 (2016); (2) Four years and eleven months in Brutsch v. Brutsch, 139 Hawaii 373 (2017); and (3) Two years and six months in Tumaneng v. Tumaneng, 138 Hawaii 468,(2016). Delays can result in unacceptable incongruities if the matter to be decided becomes moot while the appeal is pending, such as when a child reaches the age of majority before the final child custody order makes its way through the appeals process. Therefore, the purpose of this Act is to expedite the process for appealing family court orders by making the orders appealable directly to the supreme court instead of to the intermediate court of appeals. SECTION 2. Section 571-54, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows: "§571-54 Appeal. (a) An interested party, aggrieved by any order or decree of the court, may appeal to the [intermediate appellate] supreme court for review of questions of law and fact upon the same terms and conditions as in other cases in the circuit court, and review shall be governed by chapter 602, except as hereinafter provided. Where the decree or order affects the custody of a child or minor, the appeal shall be heard at the earliest practicable time. In cases under section 571-11, the record on appeal shall be given a fictitious title, to safeguard against publication of the names of the children or minors involved. (b) The stay of enforcement of an order or decree, or the pendency of an appeal, shall not suspend the order or decree of the court regarding a child or minor, or discharge the child or minor from the custody of the court or of the person, institution, or agency to whose care the child or minor has been committed, unless otherwise ordered by the family court or by the [appellate] supreme court after an appeal is taken. Pending final disposition of the case, the family court or the [appellate] supreme court, after the appeal is taken, may make such order for temporary custody as is appropriate in the circumstances. If the [appellate] supreme court does not dismiss the proceedings and discharge the child or minor, it shall affirm or modify the order of the family court and remand the child or minor to the jurisdiction of the court for disposition not inconsistent with the appellate court's finding on the appeal. (c) An order or decree entered in a proceeding based upon section 571-11(1), (2), or (6) shall be subject to appeal only as follows: Within twenty days from the date of the entry of any such order or decree, any party directly affected thereby may file a motion for a reconsideration of the facts involved. The motion and any supporting affidavit shall set forth the grounds on which a reconsideration is requested and shall be sworn to by the movant or the movant's representative. The judge shall hold a hearing on the motion, affording to all parties concerned the full right of representation by counsel and presentation of relevant evidence. The findings of the judge upon the hearing of the motion and the judge's determination and disposition of the case thereafter, and any decision, judgment, order, or decree affecting the child and entered as a result of the hearing on the motion, shall be set forth in writing and signed by the judge. Any party aggrieved by [any such] the findings, judgment, order, or decree shall have the right to appeal therefrom to the [intermediate appellate] supreme court, upon the same terms and conditions as in other cases in the circuit court, and review shall be governed by chapter 602; provided that no [such] motion for reconsideration shall operate as a stay of [any such] the findings, judgment, order, or decree unless the judge of the family court so orders; [and] provided further that no informality or technical irregularity in the proceedings prior to the hearing on the motion for reconsideration shall constitute grounds for the reversal of [any such] the findings, judgment, order, or decree by the [appellate] supreme court." SECTION 3. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date. SECTION 4. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 2060.
47+ SECTION 1. The legislature finds that delays experienced by parents and children while awaiting the disposition of appeals from family court decisions could arguably violate the due process clauses of both the state and federal constitutions. Such delays conflict with the mission of the family court, which, as stated on the family court's website, is "to provide a fair, speedy, economical, and accessible forum for the resolution of matters involving families and children." The legislature further finds that in recent years, some parents and children have had to wait up to eight years for their cases to be resolved. For example, the delays between the filing of the family court order and the decision by the supreme court have lasted as long as: (1) Seven years and eight months in Cox v. Cox, 138 Hawaii 476 (2016); (2) Four years and eleven months in Brutsch v. Brutsch, 139 Hawaii 373 (2017); and (3) Two years and six months in Tumaneng v. Tumaneng, 138 Hawaii 468,(2016). Delays can result in unacceptable incongruities if the matter to be decided becomes moot while the appeal is pending, such as when a child reaches the age of majority before the final child custody order makes its way through the appeals process. Therefore, the purpose of this Act is to expedite the process for appealing family court orders by making the orders appealable directly to the supreme court instead of to the intermediate court of appeals. SECTION 2. Section 571-54, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows: "§571-54 Appeal. (a) An interested party, aggrieved by any order or decree of the court, may appeal to the [intermediate appellate] supreme court for review of questions of law and fact upon the same terms and conditions as in other cases in the circuit court, and review shall be governed by chapter 602, except as hereinafter provided. Where the decree or order affects the custody of a child or minor, the appeal shall be heard at the earliest practicable time. In cases under section 571-11, the record on appeal shall be given a fictitious title, to safeguard against publication of the names of the children or minors involved. (b) The stay of enforcement of an order or decree, or the pendency of an appeal, shall not suspend the order or decree of the court regarding a child or minor, or discharge the child or minor from the custody of the court or of the person, institution, or agency to whose care the child or minor has been committed, unless otherwise ordered by the family court or by the [appellate] supreme court after an appeal is taken. Pending final disposition of the case, the family court or the [appellate] supreme court, after the appeal is taken, may make such order for temporary custody as is appropriate in the circumstances. If the [appellate] supreme court does not dismiss the proceedings and discharge the child or minor, it shall affirm or modify the order of the family court and remand the child or minor to the jurisdiction of the court for disposition not inconsistent with the appellate court's finding on the appeal. (c) An order or decree entered in a proceeding based upon section 571-11(1), (2), or (6) shall be subject to appeal only as follows: Within twenty days from the date of the entry of any such order or decree, any party directly affected thereby may file a motion for a reconsideration of the facts involved. The motion and any supporting affidavit shall set forth the grounds on which a reconsideration is requested and shall be sworn to by the movant or the movant's representative. The judge shall hold a hearing on the motion, affording to all parties concerned the full right of representation by counsel and presentation of relevant evidence. The findings of the judge upon the hearing of the motion and the judge's determination and disposition of the case thereafter, and any decision, judgment, order, or decree affecting the child and entered as a result of the hearing on the motion, shall be set forth in writing and signed by the judge. Any party aggrieved by [any such] the findings, judgment, order, or decree shall have the right to appeal therefrom to the [intermediate appellate] supreme court, upon the same terms and conditions as in other cases in the circuit court, and review shall be governed by chapter 602; provided that no [such] motion for reconsideration shall operate as a stay of [any such] the findings, judgment, order, or decree unless the judge of the family court so orders; and provided further that no informality or technical irregularity in the proceedings prior to the hearing on the motion for reconsideration shall constitute grounds for the reversal of [any such] the findings, judgment, order, or decree by the [appellate] supreme court." SECTION 3. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date. SECTION 4. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect upon its approval. INTRODUCED BY: _____________________________
4848
4949 SECTION 1. The legislature finds that delays experienced by parents and children while awaiting the disposition of appeals from family court decisions could arguably violate the due process clauses of both the state and federal constitutions. Such delays conflict with the mission of the family court, which, as stated on the family court's website, is "to provide a fair, speedy, economical, and accessible forum for the resolution of matters involving families and children."
5050
5151 The legislature further finds that in recent years, some parents and children have had to wait up to eight years for their cases to be resolved. For example, the delays between the filing of the family court order and the decision by the supreme court have lasted as long as:
5252
5353 (1) Seven years and eight months in Cox v. Cox, 138 Hawaii 476 (2016);
5454
5555 (2) Four years and eleven months in Brutsch v. Brutsch, 139 Hawaii 373 (2017); and
5656
5757 (3) Two years and six months in Tumaneng v. Tumaneng, 138 Hawaii 468,(2016).
5858
5959 Delays can result in unacceptable incongruities if the matter to be decided becomes moot while the appeal is pending, such as when a child reaches the age of majority before the final child custody order makes its way through the appeals process.
6060
6161 Therefore, the purpose of this Act is to expedite the process for appealing family court orders by making the orders appealable directly to the supreme court instead of to the intermediate court of appeals.
6262
6363 SECTION 2. Section 571-54, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
6464
6565 "§571-54 Appeal. (a) An interested party, aggrieved by any order or decree of the court, may appeal to the [intermediate appellate] supreme court for review of questions of law and fact upon the same terms and conditions as in other cases in the circuit court, and review shall be governed by chapter 602, except as hereinafter provided. Where the decree or order affects the custody of a child or minor, the appeal shall be heard at the earliest practicable time. In cases under section 571-11, the record on appeal shall be given a fictitious title, to safeguard against publication of the names of the children or minors involved.
6666
6767 (b) The stay of enforcement of an order or decree, or the pendency of an appeal, shall not suspend the order or decree of the court regarding a child or minor, or discharge the child or minor from the custody of the court or of the person, institution, or agency to whose care the child or minor has been committed, unless otherwise ordered by the family court or by the [appellate] supreme court after an appeal is taken. Pending final disposition of the case, the family court or the [appellate] supreme court, after the appeal is taken, may make such order for temporary custody as is appropriate in the circumstances. If the [appellate] supreme court does not dismiss the proceedings and discharge the child or minor, it shall affirm or modify the order of the family court and remand the child or minor to the jurisdiction of the court for disposition not inconsistent with the appellate court's finding on the appeal.
6868
6969 (c) An order or decree entered in a proceeding based upon section 571-11(1), (2), or (6) shall be subject to appeal only as follows:
7070
71- Within twenty days from the date of the entry of any such order or decree, any party directly affected thereby may file a motion for a reconsideration of the facts involved. The motion and any supporting affidavit shall set forth the grounds on which a reconsideration is requested and shall be sworn to by the movant or the movant's representative. The judge shall hold a hearing on the motion, affording to all parties concerned the full right of representation by counsel and presentation of relevant evidence. The findings of the judge upon the hearing of the motion and the judge's determination and disposition of the case thereafter, and any decision, judgment, order, or decree affecting the child and entered as a result of the hearing on the motion, shall be set forth in writing and signed by the judge. Any party aggrieved by [any such] the findings, judgment, order, or decree shall have the right to appeal therefrom to the [intermediate appellate] supreme court, upon the same terms and conditions as in other cases in the circuit court, and review shall be governed by chapter 602; provided that no [such] motion for reconsideration shall operate as a stay of [any such] the findings, judgment, order, or decree unless the judge of the family court so orders; [and] provided further that no informality or technical irregularity in the proceedings prior to the hearing on the motion for reconsideration shall constitute grounds for the reversal of [any such] the findings, judgment, order, or decree by the [appellate] supreme court."
71+ Within twenty days from the date of the entry of any such order or decree, any party directly affected thereby may file a motion for a reconsideration of the facts involved. The motion and any supporting affidavit shall set forth the grounds on which a reconsideration is requested and shall be sworn to by the movant or the movant's representative. The judge shall hold a hearing on the motion, affording to all parties concerned the full right of representation by counsel and presentation of relevant evidence. The findings of the judge upon the hearing of the motion and the judge's determination and disposition of the case thereafter, and any decision, judgment, order, or decree affecting the child and entered as a result of the hearing on the motion, shall be set forth in writing and signed by the judge. Any party aggrieved by [any such] the findings, judgment, order, or decree shall have the right to appeal therefrom to the [intermediate appellate] supreme court, upon the same terms and conditions as in other cases in the circuit court, and review shall be governed by chapter 602; provided that no [such] motion for reconsideration shall operate as a stay of [any such] the findings, judgment, order, or decree unless the judge of the family court so orders; and provided further that no informality or technical irregularity in the proceedings prior to the hearing on the motion for reconsideration shall constitute grounds for the reversal of [any such] the findings, judgment, order, or decree by the [appellate] supreme court."
7272
7373 SECTION 3. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date.
7474
7575 SECTION 4. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
7676
77- SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 2060.
77+ SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
7878
79- Report Title: Family Court; Supreme Court; Appeals Description: Makes decisions of the family court appealable to the supreme court instead of the intermediate court of appeals. Effective 7/1/2060. (HD1) The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
79+
80+
81+INTRODUCED BY: _____________________________
82+
83+INTRODUCED BY:
84+
85+_____________________________
86+
87+
88+
89+
90+
91+ Report Title: Family Court; Supreme Court Description: Makes decisions of the family court appealable to the supreme court instead of the intermediate court of appeals. The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
8092
8193
8294
8395
8496
8597 Report Title:
8698
87-Family Court; Supreme Court; Appeals
99+Family Court; Supreme Court
88100
89101
90102
91103 Description:
92104
93-Makes decisions of the family court appealable to the supreme court instead of the intermediate court of appeals. Effective 7/1/2060. (HD1)
105+Makes decisions of the family court appealable to the supreme court instead of the intermediate court of appeals.
94106
95107
96108
97109
98110
99111
100112
101113 The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.