Committing To Provide Greater Public Access To The Legislative Process By Adopting Rules To Allow For Virtual Testimony, Recorded Hearings, And Internet Broadcasts Of Hearings Beyond Periods Of Catastrophic Events.
The resolution is significant as it seeks to bridge gaps in public participation caused by geographical barriers and has been highlighted as particularly impactful given the challenges presented during the COVID-19 pandemic. The implementation of remote hearing procedures aims to enhance access for approximately four hundred thousand residents who face difficulties traveling to attend legislative hearings in person. This approach aligns with efforts initiated decades earlier with Act 331, Session Laws of Hawaii 1989, which aimed to improve the accessibility of legislative information.
HCR171 is a resolution passed by the State of Hawaii's House of Representatives that commits to improving public access to the legislative process through the adoption of rules allowing for virtual testimony, recorded hearings, and internet broadcasts of hearings, extending beyond periods of catastrophic events. The resolution emphasizes the importance of citizen engagement in legislative decisions that affect their daily lives, particularly in Hawaii's unique geographic context of being an archipelago, which presents challenges in physical attendance at meetings.
Overall, the sentiment surrounding HCR171 appears positive, with strong support for its goal of making the legislative process more accessible to all Hawaiians, especially during periods of emergency like the pandemic. The use of remote technology for public testimony has been viewed favorably for its potential to enhance participation risks and for accommodating individuals, including the elderly and those with disabilities. As a result, stakeholders recognize the necessity of evolving legislative processes to align with contemporary technological capabilities.
A notable point of contention regarding the resolution includes discussions around the balance of maintaining traditional in-person hearings versus the flexibility offered by virtual options. While some legislators and community members advocate for remote participation as a permanent enhancement to the legislative process, others may argue that in-person interactions are crucial for certain aspects of public discourse and engagement. This ongoing debate reflects broader conversations about legislative transparency, public engagement, and adaptation in the wake of societal shifts brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic.