Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB1171

Introduced
1/27/21  

Caption

Relating To Crustaceans.

Impact

The repeal of section 188-58.5 means that the management of these crustacean species will be handled more flexibly through administrative rules rather than being strictly bound by the statutory prohibition. This change is aimed at fostering more effective conservation and management by enabling the department to tailor regulations based on updated scientific knowledge and public commentary. While the intent is to enhance management strategies, the broader implications on both commercial and recreational fishing practices will need to be assessed as these new rules are developed.

Summary

Senate Bill 1171 seeks to amend the current regulations regarding the protection of certain crustacean species in Hawaii, specifically female spiny lobsters (ula), Kona crabs, and Samoan crabs. The bill proposes to repeal section 188-58.5 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, which currently prohibits the taking, killing, or possession of these species. Instead, it allows the Department of Land and Natural Resources to set regulations through the administrative rule process. This process is intended to facilitate changes in regulations that can better respond to the evolving ecological and environmental conditions affecting these crustaceans.

Contention

While the bill appears to streamline management processes, it may face opposition from conservation advocates and certain stakeholders who are concerned that loosening regulations could lead to overfishing or harm to the species' populations. Critics might argue that the existing prohibition serves as a critical safeguard for these vulnerable species, and transitioning to an administrative rules framework might not provide the necessary protections without stringent oversight and proper checks in place. As the bill progresses, discussions around the balance between environmental protection and resource utilization will likely emerge as a significant point of contention.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1680

Transportation: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District: policing responsibilities.

NJ S2121

Requires adoption of anti-nepotism policies by school districts and charter schools.

NJ A1524

Requires adoption of anti-nepotism policies by school districts and charter schools.

NJ S1751

Requires adoption of anti-nepotism policies by school districts and charter schools.

CA AB1735

Transit districts: prohibition orders.

CA SB1417

Transit districts: prohibition orders.

CA AB468

Transit districts: prohibition orders.

CA AB730

Transit districts: prohibition orders.