If enacted, SB203 would amend Section 671-3 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, mandating that informed consent, which includes an extensive explanation of the treatment condition, procedure details, possible outcomes, and alternative options, must be obtained prior to the day of treatment. This move is anticipated to improve patient safety and accountability among healthcare providers by ensuring they adhere to explicit guidelines related to informed consent. The bill's implementation could lead to modifications in how healthcare providers approach patient interactions, particularly in terms of transparency and thoroughness when discussing treatment options.
Summary
Senate Bill 203 (SB203) focuses on enhancing medical informed consent practices in Hawaii. The bill stipulates that the Hawaii medical board must establish standards that healthcare providers must follow to ensure that patients, or their guardians, provide informed consent before undergoing medical treatments. The intent of this legislation is to enhance patient understanding and autonomy in healthcare decision-making processes. It emphasizes the importance of communicating essential information to patients regarding their treatment options, risks, and benefits, which is pivotal in fostering trust in the patient-provider relationship.
Contention
However, there are points of contention surrounding SB203, particularly regarding the practicality and thoroughness of obtaining informed consent. Critics argue that the requirements set forth might create delays in treatment, especially in emergency situations where time is crucial. There’s concern about the feasibility of obtaining comprehensive consent forms, which might complicate the workflow for healthcare providers. Additionally, there are fears that strictly adhering to the informed consent guidelines could potentially lead to medical malpractice litigation if patients feel inadequately informed regardless of the care provided.
Last_action
SB203 is expected to undergo further legislative scrutiny to address these concerns while balancing patient protection with efficient healthcare delivery.
Relating to advance directives, do-not-resuscitate orders, and health care treatment decisions made by or on behalf of certain patients, including a review of directives and decisions.